Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: stephen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Henry Haapalainen wrote:
What I wrote was the following:
"...look into something with a completely different perspective." That
sounds like true science to me, unlike most of the postings here. (HH)
That's right. "Looking into something with a completely different
perspective" is no indicator of it being "true science". It is an
indicator of originality, not of science.
PD
For example, deciding that the Universe is controlled by invisible
cats would be looking into things with a completely different perspective.
However unless I can find some experimental support for the invisible
cats, it is not scientific.
Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: PD
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- References:
- dimensions are energy??
- From: Nishu
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: Nishu
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: PD
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: dimensions are energy??
- From: PD
- dimensions are energy??
- Prev by Date: Re: An IITJEE problem
- Next by Date: Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- Previous by thread: Re: dimensions are energy??
- Next by thread: Re: dimensions are energy??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading