Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2006 02:50:18 -0700
Eric Gisse wrote:
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[snip]
The reason for rewriting the above is the following:
How come an ANTIneutrino is formed when a neutron converts into a
proton & an electron and a neutrino instead when vice-versa(converting
a proton & an electron into a neutron)? (That is if science knows the
reason why)
Mabey there is a relevant conservation law?
knowing Eric's attitude, that's a rhetorical statement but as well
there might be other conservation laws as well:
Such as if you got excess neutrons, protons or electrons in an atom (or
spacel) then somethings gotta happen to rebalance things such as old
atoms, protons, electrons, neutrons gone and replaced with the
formation of new atoms, neutrons, protons, or electrons....(example: I
don't think you can find single electrons, protons, neutrons roming by
themselves in space)?
Likewise perhaps neutrinos or antineutrinos cannot exist in random
unlimitted quantities or combinations in space.
(therefore what I'm getting at, is I doubt that an electron cannot be
subdivided further into another particle and that the "only" way of
elimination any excess electrons in space is by reforming atoms, or
combining the excess electrons with protons to form neutrons...(since
neutrinos are also formed(ejected) in that process and neutrinos like
electrons perhaps cannot existed solo in random unlimitted quantities
in space)?
.
- References:
- Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
- Prev by Date: Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
- Next by Date: Re: TIME DILATION
- Previous by thread: Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
- Next by thread: Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
