Re: dimensions are energy??


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:8oM4g.1647$AB3.940@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Nishu:

"Nishu" <amitk_dni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146326066.852417.60110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
But I will also like to add that once even 'earth is
round' seemed to be a creative and unscientific
thought, or evolution

No, the Greeks had identified that the Earth was round (and measured the
curvature), long before Europeans got in trouble with the Church for
pointing out the facts. "The Earth Is Round" was simply politically
incorrect, because the Church was dominant in politics at that time.

Indeed - for the full gory detail see
http://hps.arts.unsw.edu.au/hps_content/online_resources/online_inhouse_res/schuster_SciRev_book/Schuster_a_contents.htm


or even universal nature of a single force called
gravity (However whoever proposed these
thoughts were, unlike me, greatest minds of
their time). And as you believe in quantum
mechanics (as I hope), you cannot completely
discard probabilty of any event, however small
it may be.

That is one of the problems with applying quantum mechanics to the real
world. A probability can be assigned to a particular cow, having been
slaughtered, processed, and consumed... to be reconstituted into the
original cow.

Your idea is not sharp, not in focus. Until you make some predictions, it
can neither be supported nor defeated. Until it is fully expressed (or
discarded), it will always stand between you and more understanding. Your
next step is to see what "dimensions are energy" implies...

And that is where a problem arises - time is a dimension - but Noethers
theorem shows that energy is basically about time symmetry which would seem
to rule the idea out. However you may still wish to pursue it - but it does
not look fruitful - ie as Pauli would say - it seems not even wrong.

Thanks
Bill


David A. Smith



.

Relevant Pages