sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• History of gravity theory, David . Paterson
  • Re: History of gravity theory, The Sorcerer
  • Re: History of gravity theory, Ilja Schmelzer
• Maxwell's vs. Einstein's field equations, Sue...
  • Re: Maxwell's vs. Einstein's field equations, Sue...
• Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
  • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Spoonfed
  • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Bilge
    • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
  • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., BernardZ
    • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., The Sorcerer
  • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., PD
    • Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor., Golden Boar
• A day in the gay life of Eric Gisse (Geese), guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A day in the gay life of Eric Gisse (Geese), Igor
• French Bald Bilge's & Eric Gisse's 1st day in class!, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• 3rd Week Anniversary of French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation, eleaticus
  • Re: Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation, Bilge
    • Re: Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation, eleaticus
• SR's time dilation derivations: synopsis, eleaticus
  • Re: SR's time dilation derivations: synopsis, Eric Gisse
  • Re: SR's time dilation derivations: synopsis, Sue...
• A 'Massless' question?, varun
  • Re: A 'Massless' question?, Igor
    • Re: A 'Massless' question?, Varun...
      • Re: A 'Massless' question?, bz
  • Re: A 'Massless' question?, Sue...
  • Re: A 'Massless' question?, bz
  • Re: A 'Massless' question?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: A 'Massless' question?, Harry
  • Re: A 'Massless' question?, Tom Roberts
• Re: Speed and mass, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Speed and mass, Tom Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Speed and mass, David . Paterson
  • Re: Speed and mass, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Speed and mass, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Speed and mass, PD
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities", Klim
  • Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities", Vert
• Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Dead Paul
  • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Eric Gisse
    • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Dead Paul
  • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Tom Roberts
    • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Eric Gisse
      • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Tom Roberts
  • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), Sue...
  • Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein), dda1
• Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Dead Paul
  • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Sue...
    • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Dead Paul
    • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Dead Paul
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Dead Paul
  • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Paul, Leonard Abbott
    • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Paul, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Sue, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue, Sue...
    • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Paul, Dead Paul
  • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here, dda1
    • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here ER, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here ER, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE, dda1
• 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen, Dead Paul
  • Re: 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen, Harry
    • Re: 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen, Dead Paul
  • Re: 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen, Sue...
• 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR, Dead Paul
  • Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR, Harry
    • Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR, Dead Paul
      • Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR, Harry
      • Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR, Eric Gisse
  • Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR, Bilge
• May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, Bilge
    • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, Bilge
  • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?, The Sorcerer
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Klim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Vert
• Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western Civilization, Leonard Abbott
  • Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of WesternCivilization, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill, Igor
      • Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill, Eric Gisse
• Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Sue...
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Sue...
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, bz
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Sue...
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, bz
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Sue...
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, bz
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, bz
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???, The_Man
• Re: Direct TWLS Measurement, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Direct TWLS Measurement, The Sorcerer
• Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of ''Western Civilization', Leonard Abbott
• On The Measurement Of Speed, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
    • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
    • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, Thomas Jones
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, Thomas Jones
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Sorcerer
  • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, kenseto
    • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, kenseto
  • Re: On The Measurement Of Speed, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "General Relativity Examined", Vert
• h ?, Vert
  • Re: h ?, FrediFizzx
• Re: Atheism - Defined, Tom McDonald
• Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?, Tareq
  • Re: Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?, Tareq
  • Re: Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?, Bilge
• major new book on the Periodic Table, scerri
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Spoonfed
  • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, eleaticus
    • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eric Gisse
      • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, eleaticus
      • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eric Gisse
      • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, eleaticus
      • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, eleaticus
    • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Spoonfed
    • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, David DeLaney
• What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Sue...
    • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Sue...
  • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Igor
    • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, dead paul
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, dead paul
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Igor
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, dead paul
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Dead Paul
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Igor
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, dead paul
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Igor
    • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Dead Paul
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
    • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Sue...
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Sue...
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Sue...
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Sue...
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, kk
      • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, The_Man
  • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, Bilge
    • Re: What space program has tested time dilation?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, crapaccount1138
  • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, varun
  • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Sue...
  • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, crapaccount1138
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Sue...
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, crapaccount1138
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Sue...
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Sue...
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Sue...
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, Thomas Nickerson
      • Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?, The Sorcerer
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Vert
  • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, tomgee
    • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Vert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, tomgee
  • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, The Sorcerer
  • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, The Sorcerer
    • Message not available
      • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?, Phil
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Sue...
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Igor
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Sue...
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Sue...
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Sue...
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Sue...
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Sue...
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, varun
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Vert
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, AllYou!
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, tomgee
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, actionintegral
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, kenseto
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Igor
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?, The Ghost In The Machine
• Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Spoonfed
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, dead_paul
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Spoonfed
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Spoonfed
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Spoonfed
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Spoonfed
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Spoonfed
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?", varun
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Vert
• a relativistic question???, varun
  • Re: a relativistic question???, The Sorcerer
  • Re: a relativistic question???, Sue...
    • Re: a relativistic question???, roguejag
      • Re: a relativistic question???, Sue...
  • Re: a relativistic question???, PD
    • Re: a relativistic question???, varun
      • Re: a relativistic question???, PD
  • Re: a relativistic question???, Tom Roberts
    • Re: a relativistic question???, Sue...
    • Re: a relativistic question???, varun
      • Re: a relativistic question???, Sue...
      • Re: a relativistic question???, Sue...
• Relativity is not science!, Leonard Abbott
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, Henry Haapalainen
    • Re: Relativity is not science! Henry, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! Henry, Igor
      • Re: Relativity is not science! IGOR all, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! IGOR all, Igor
      • Re: Relativity is not science! Henry, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, Vert
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bilge
    • Re: Relativity is not science!, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bilge
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, The_Man
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, The_Man
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bilge
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, PD
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Bilge
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Relativity is not science!, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science!, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Relativity is not science! Eric, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! Eric, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativity is not science! Eric, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! bill, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Relativity is not science!, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, PD
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, dead paul
    • Re: Relativity is not science!, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Relativity is not science!, Igor
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, surrealistic-dream
    • Re: Relativity is not science! surr, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! surr, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Relativity is not science! surr, Leonard Abbott
      • Re: Relativity is not science! surr, dda1
      • Re: Relativity is not science! surr, PD
  • Re: Relativity is not science!, dda1
• Re: *GOD* Supports "Marriage Protection Amendment"! `~, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Gedankenexperiment, PeteK
  • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment, PeteK
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, AllYou!
  • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Sue...
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Gedankenexperiment, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Eli Botkin
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment, PeteK
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Eli Botkin
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Eli Botkin
  • Re: Gedankenexperiment, Paul B. Andersen
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Kalb
• Is relatitivistic mass only observational or doth it's gravity also increase?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, Sue...
    • Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, Sue...
      • Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, Sue...
  • Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??, Bilge
• Relativity., Stamenin
  • Re: Relativity., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Relativity., Stamenin
      • Re: Relativity., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Relativity., Stamenin
      • Re: Relativity., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Relativity., Bilge
• To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
    • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: To Androcles, eleaticus
    • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: To Androcles, actionintegral
      • Message not available
      • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
  • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
    • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
      • Re: To Androcles, actionintegral
      • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
  • Re: To Androcles, PD
    • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
      • Re: To Androcles, PD
      • Re: To Androcles, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: To Androcles, PD
      • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
      • Re: To Androcles, The Sorcerer
      • Re: To Androcles, Rudolf Drabek
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, chemguy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, FrediFizzx
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Igor
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Randy Poe
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Sue...
    • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Vert
    • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Golden Boar
      • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, The Sorcerer
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, JanPB
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, The Sorcerer
    • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Bill Hobba
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
      • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, AllYou!
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, xray4abc
    • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, The Sorcerer
  • Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question, dead paul
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Vert
  • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, dda1
    • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Vert
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, dda1
  • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Igor
    • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Vert
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Vert
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, bz
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Golden Boar
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Golden Boar
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Golden Boar
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Vert
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Golden Boar
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Igor
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, The Real Chris
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Igor
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Golden Boar
    • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat, Y.Porat
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Kalb
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", dda1
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Vert
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", JanPB
    • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Bilge
• GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, dead_paul
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Igor
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Tom Roberts
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, vanep
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, vanep
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, vanep
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, vanep
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, vanep
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, sal
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, bz
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Tom Roberts
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, bz
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Tom Roberts
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, GSS
      • Humpty Roberts says SR is irrelevant. <shrug>, The Sorcerer
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Tom Roberts
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Eric Gisse
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Sue...
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Eric Gisse
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Sue...
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, bz
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Sue...
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Sue...
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, bz
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Sue...
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, AllYou!
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Tom Van Flandern
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, The Sorcerer
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Phil
    • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
• Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Sue...
    • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
    • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
    • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, dda1
    • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, xray4abc
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, actionintegral
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Sue...
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, PD
  • Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !, Sue...
• The Relativity Rant, PD
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, Golden Boar
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, Golden Boar
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, Bill Hobba
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, The Sorcerer
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, Jem
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, dead_paul
      • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, dda1
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, AllYou!
    • Re: The Relativity Rant, PD
  • Re: The Relativity Rant, xray4abc
• Gravitation Energy and Centrafugal Force, paul . valletta
  • Re: Gravitation Energy and Centrafugal Force, Phil
• Frequency based gravity, Golden Boar
  • Re: Frequency based gravity, Sue...
    • Re: Frequency based gravity, Golden Boar
      • Re: Frequency based gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Frequency based gravity, Golden Boar
      • Re: Frequency based gravity, makc . the . great
• new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou
  • Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Bill Hobba
    • Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Vert
      • Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, paul . valletta
  • Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Bilge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou
    • Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, paul . valletta
• Kooks' Journals, dda1
  • Re: Kooks' Journals, dda1
  • Re: Kooks' Journals, Harry
    • Re: Kooks' Journals, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Kooks' Journals, dda1
• Kooks conference, dda1
  • Re: Kooks conference, Harry
  • Re: Kooks conference, fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Kooks conference, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Kooks conference, Bilge
• "The Properties of the Aether", Kalb
• Big Flop, mluttgens
  • Re: Big Flop, The Sorcerer
• Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Falling space, dda1
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Falling space, Sue...
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, Sue...
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, Sue...
  • Re: Falling space, xxein
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Falling space, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Falling space, Jem
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Falling space, Igor
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, Igor
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, PD
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, PD
      • Re: Falling space, Igor
  • Re: Falling space, PD
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, dda1
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, dda1
  • Re: Falling space, surrealistic-dream
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Falling space, Mike
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, Igor
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, PD
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, PD
      • Re: Falling space, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Falling space, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Falling space, Tim
    • Re: Falling space, Henry Haapalainen
• they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Igor
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Igor
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Sorcerer
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Sorcerer
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Bill Hobba
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, xxein
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, bz
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Sorcerer
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Sorcerer
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Bilge
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, The Sorcerer
  • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, PD
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
    • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, PD
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, PD
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, PD
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Randy Poe
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, PD
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, PD
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, dead_paul
      • Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university, Sue...
• "Не так уж страшен чёрт, как нам его малюют", vira37
  • Re: "Не так уж страшен чёрт, как нам его малюют", sal
• Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, John C . Polasek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, John C . Polasek
• trivial and naive absolutes in physics, beda pietanza
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Moc
• Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, dead_paul
  • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, Igor
    • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, dead_paul
  • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, Harry
    • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, The Sorcerer
  • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, JanPB
    • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, JanPB
      • Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed, The Sorcerer
• anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, dead_paul
  • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Message not available
      • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Message not available
      • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, dead_paul
    • Message not available
      • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, Hexenmeister
  • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, Jem
    • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, dead_paul
      • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?, Dirk Van de moortel
• Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
  • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
    • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Bilge
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Dirk Van de Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, dead_paul
    • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash, Sue...
• Time is an Illusion, Brolling
  • Re: Time is an Illusion, Hexenmeister
• 'Greater' Reality Question, RHN
  • Re: 'Greater' Reality Question, Bill Hobba
• GR and piezoelectricity?, Ken S. Tucker
• Theoretical experiment on relativity, drme1981@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Sue...
    • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Sue...
      • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Sue...
  • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Igor
  • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, drme1981@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer
• Re: Physics is dead!, surrealistic-dream
  • Re: Physics is dead!, YBM
• Re: EINSTEIN'S HALF SALVATION, Hexenmeister
• What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, Barry and Sandra
    • Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, Tom Roberts
    • Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??, The Sorcerer
• Quantum mechanics vs Relativity, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "The Arrow of Time", Moc
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", Vert
• Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
  • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, GSS
    • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, GSS
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, dda1
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, GSS
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, dda1
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Vert
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, GSS
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, GSS
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Vert
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, dda1
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Vert
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, PD
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Vert
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, David McAnally
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Vert
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's disservice to physics, kenseto