sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Maxwell's vs. Einstein's field equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity is not science! surr
  • From: PD
• Re: A day in the gay life of Eric Gisse (Geese)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here ER
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: dda1
• Re: Relativity is not science! surr
  • From: dda1
• Re: Speed and mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE
  • From: dda1
• Re: Speed and mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here ER
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• "Gravity"
  • From: Klim
• Re: Relativity is not science! surr
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Speed and mass
  • From: PD
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: History of gravity theory
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: History of gravity theory
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation
  • From: eleaticus
• History of gravity theory
  • From: David . Paterson
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: bz
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: The_Man
• Maxwell's vs. Einstein's field equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Sue...
• Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Link to a recent workshop on alternative theories of gravity (with slides)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Kooks conference
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: SR's time dilation derivations: synopsis
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speed and mass
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: dda1
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: dda1
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Another look at the Lorentz factor.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A day in the gay life of Eric Gisse (Geese)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• French Bald Bilge's & Eric Gisse's 1st day in class!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• 3rd Week Anniversary of French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: Varun...
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: bz
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: Speed and mass
  • From: David . Paterson
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Vert
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Einstein's (1905) time dilation derivation
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity is not science! surr
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR's time dilation derivations: synopsis
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Sue
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill
  • From: Igor
• Re: A 'Massless' question?
  • From: Igor
• SR's time dilation derivations: synopsis
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Vert
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Paul
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: PD
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
  • From: Harry
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: kk
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Bilge
• A 'Massless' question?
  • From: varun
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Paul
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed and mass
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here~~~ Paul
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Psychiatric Analysis
  • From: Bilge
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Klim
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen
  • From: Harry
• Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
  • From: Harry
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Phil
• Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• 3 Soddy, Lorentz, Bohr, Essen
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• May Hafele and Keating forgive my arrogance?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western C bill
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Thomas Nickerson
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Klim
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: crapaccount1138
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of WesternCivilization
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity is not science! surr
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: kenseto
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: Thomas Jones
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: bz
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: bz
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: bz
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of Western Civilization
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Direct TWLS Measurement
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: dead paul
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: dead paul
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Did High Gs affect a Plane's Time Dilation measurements???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: Thomas Jones
• Re: Direct TWLS Measurement
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of ''Western Civilization'
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• On The Measurement Of Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: crapaccount1138
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: h ?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Igor
• h ?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Atheism - Defined
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Sue...
• Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: dead paul
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: dead paul
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• major new book on the Periodic Table
  • From: scerri
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE FINAL SOLUTION TO THE SPEED OF LIGHT PROBLEM
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: bz
• Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: dead paul
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: dead paul
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Igor
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS
  • From: David DeLaney
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Vert
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Igor
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativity is not science! IGOR all
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: Sue...
• What space program has tested time dilation?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Kalb
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: varun
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: bz
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Falling space
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Falling space
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: varun
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: varun
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: varun
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Does a snail experience relativistic effects?
  • From: crapaccount1138
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity is not science! bill
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Relativity is not science! IGOR all
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is not science! Eric
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is not science! Eric
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Vert
• Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Does Light Always Move at 'c' WRT its Source?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: vanep
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling space
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is not science! Henry
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling space
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: vanep
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: PD
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science! Henry
  • From: Igor
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: roguejag
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: PeteK
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaaas Vroom
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: varun
• Re: a relativistic question???
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• a relativistic question???
  • From: varun
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity is not science! Eric
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Relativity is not science! Henry
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: dda1
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Vert
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: vanep
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Vert
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: vanep
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Vert
• Re: Relativity is not science!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Relativity is not science!
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: *GOD* Supports "Marriage Protection Amendment"! `~
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: PeteK
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: bz
• Re: Gedankenexperiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Gedankenexperiment
  • From: PeteK
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Kalb
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: PD
• Humpty Roberts says SR is irrelevant. <shrug>
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: GSS
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: bz
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: vanep
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Is relatitivistic mass only observational or doth it's gravity also increase?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Why doth only the 4th dimension remain contracted?? ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Golden Boar
• To Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kooks conference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Vert
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Vert
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Vert
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Kooks conference
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: What is this newsgroup really about? Newcomer question
  • From: chemguy
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: sal
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Igor
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Igor
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: bz
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: dda1
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
  • From: Vert
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Igor
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: GSS
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Tim
• Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: dda1
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Kalb
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: PD
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling space
  • From: PD
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: PD
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Jem
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: bz
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: dda1
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Kooks conference
  • From: Harry
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: Gravitation Energy and Centrafugal Force
  • From: Phil
• Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: Sue...
• Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: Falling space
  • From: dda1
• Re: Falling space
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: PD
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Relativity Rant
  • From: PD
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Frequency based gravity
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Falling space
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Falling space
  • From: dda1
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Vert
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: GSS
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: bz
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Gravitation Energy and Centrafugal Force
  • From: paul . valletta
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency based gravity
  • From: makc . the . great
• Re: Frequency based gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Kooks' Journals
  • From: dda1
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: Frequency based gravity
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Frequency based gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: bz
• Frequency based gravity
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Kooks' Journals
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Kooks' Journals
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: paul . valletta
• Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: paul . valletta
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Tareq
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: drme1981@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: Kooks' Journals
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Kooks' Journals
  • From: dda1
• Kooks conference
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling space
  • From: PD
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Kalb
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Igor
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: bz
• Re: Big Flop
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: dda1
• Big Flop
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: bz
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Jem
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "Не так уж страшен чёрт, как нам его малюют"
  • From: sal
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: bz
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: Harry
• Re: 'Greater' Reality Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: Falling space
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: THE FINAL SOLUTION TO THE SPEED OF LIGHT PROBLEM
  • From: makc . the . great
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: The Sorcerer
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de Androcles
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de Androcles
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Bilge
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: xxein
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Psychiatric Analysis
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling space
  • From: xxein
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: manesiro
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Psychiatric Analysis
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Falling space
  • From: dda1
• Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Igor
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: Sue...
• they are wronglyl teaching relativity of simultaneity at university
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de Androcles
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de Androcles
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Tareq
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Igor
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Psychiatric Analysis
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: GSS
• Psychiatric Analysis
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: tomgee
• "Не так уж страшен чёрт, как нам его малюют"
  • From: vira37
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: stephen
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• trivial and naive absolutes in physics
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Moc
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time is an Illusion
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: GSS
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: dead_paul
• Einsteins clock synchro is fatally flawed
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: Jem
• anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: anyone care to publish a plonk list for this ng?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
  • From: dead_paul
• Time is an Illusion
  • From: Brolling
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• 'Greater' Reality Question
  • From: RHN
• GR and piezoelectricity?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: tomgee
• Theoretical experiment on relativity
  • From: drme1981@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Physics is dead!
  • From: YBM
• Re: Physics is dead!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: Barry and Sandra
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: EINSTEIN'S HALF SALVATION
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum mechanics vs Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Moc
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: GSS
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Mike
• Re: A relativity Paradox
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Barry and Sandra
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: manesiro
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: GSS
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Einstein's disservice to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: dda1
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: THE FINAL SOLUTION TO THE SPEED OF LIGHT PROBLEM
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: space without geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• space without geometry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: dda1
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Barry and Sandra
• A new paradox in relativity (At least for me)
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: PD
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: Non-locality of time in an IRF
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: PD
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: dda1
• Re: A relativity Paradox
  • From: dda1
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: dda1
• The Lorentz Transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Non-locality of time in an IRF
  • From: PD
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: tomgee
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: tomgee
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: PD
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: dda1
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Non-locality of time in an IRF
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: dda1
• Re: Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: PD
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Igor
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: PD
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: PD
• Re: DESIDERATA
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: PD
• DESIDERATA
  • From: Vert
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Vert
• Re: Violation of Bell's inequality and "action-at-a-distance"
  • From: Tim
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: actionintegral
• Spacetime Topology Polysign
  • From: Tim
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: goodbyeblueskye
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Moc
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Tim
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Link to a recent workshop on alternative theories of gravity (with slides)
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: curved universe
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: jhnrmsdn
• curved universe
  • From: anawazus
• Re: A Singular Foundation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Sue...
• A Singular Foundation
  • From: RHN
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: stephen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test
  • From: Chad J
• Empirical cult
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Link to a recent workshop on alternative theories of gravity (with slides)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: PD
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• Re: Link to a recent workshop on alternative theories of gravity (with slides)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: CajunDick
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: stephen
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: tomgee
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: kenseto
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Moc
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: It can be proven, that the space can't be absolute
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: tomgee
• Re: It can be proven, that the space can't be absolute
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: FrediFakir and the mysterious "We".
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: FrediFakir and the mysterious "We".
  • From: FrediFizzx
• FrediFakir and the mysterious "We".
  • From: Androfizzx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: vanep
• Link to a recent workshop on alternative theories of gravity (with slides)
  • From: melroysoares
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: vanep
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Photo-electro-magnetic forces
  • From: chemguy
• This thread has been hijacked.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: stephen
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Tim
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: stephen
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: PD
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: It can be proven, that the space can't be absolute
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: DDEckerslyke
• Re: Violation of Bell's inequality and "action-at-a-distance"
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Tim
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: dda1
• Re: Acknowledgment of three possible spacetime geometries
  • From: Tim
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• An Unpleasant Discussion
  • From: manesiro
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• SR is built on false assumptions....continued
  • From: CajunDick
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Moc
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Acknowledgment of three possible spacetime geometries
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: NEW INSIGHTS IN EINSTEIN'S CRIMINAL CULT
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Barry and Sandra
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Violation of Bell's inequality and "action-at-a-distance"
  • From: Tim
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: SCW
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Violation of Bell's inequality and "action-at-a-distance"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Acknowledgment of three possible spacetime geometries
  • From: Tim
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: stephen
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Twins Paradox over a lifetime
  • From: DDEckerslyke
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: It can be proven, that the space can't be absolute
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: It can be proven, that the space can't be absolute
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Perhaps THEE Final Missing Piece to Einstein's Relativity = Relatistic Mass
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: bz
• Re: A rebirth of Relavistic Mass may put to death Negative Binding Energy?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Igor
• It can be proven, that the space can't be absolute
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near"c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near"c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near"c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No comment
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: No comment
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• A rebirth of Relavistic Mass may put to death Negative Binding Energy?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Acknowledgment of three possible spacetime geometries
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near"c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: stephen
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: NWR XOR
• Re: Violation of Bell's inequality and "action-at-a-distance"
  • From: dda1
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: NWR XOR
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near"c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near"c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Violation of Bell's inequality and "action-at-a-distance"
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Moc
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: bz
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: bz
• AU
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: NWR XOR
• Re: No comment
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• No comment
  • From: JanPB
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: How warp drive works
  • From: paul . valletta
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Shreyas
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: stephen
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: dda1
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Spoonfed
• Age of Star according to SR Question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: stephen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: melroysoares
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: NWR XOR
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: ROTFLOL....The SRians are contradicting themselves
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• ROTFLOL....The SRians are contradicting themselves
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: NWR XOR
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Vert
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Vert
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Vert
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Vert
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Arnie
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: dda1
• Question about the Lorentz factor
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Tim
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Property of photon.
  • From: Sue...
• Property of photon.
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: What is frequency??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Tim
• What is frequency??
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Stumped by Classical Physics Problem
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Wikipedia articles on relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: NWR XOR
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Barry and Sandra
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Barry,sl
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Mike
• Re: MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Vert
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Amir
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The most absurd epicycle ever invented
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: YBM
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Antiworld. Its Inhabitants and the Quantum of Light
  • From: socratus
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: jcon
• The Infinity: a symbol or reality.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Imaginary mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Imaginary mass?
  • From: Amir
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Antiworld. Its Inhabitants and the Quantum of Light
  • From: jcon
• Re: The Antiworld. Its Inhabitants and the Quantum of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Light so Fast it Travels Backward
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The most absurd epicycle ever invented
  • From: kenseto
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's ine...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity waves and "speed of gravity" questions
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: PD
• Re: MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Vert
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light so Fast it Travels Backward
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light so Fast it Travels Backward
  • From: paul . valletta
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: paul . valletta
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: bz
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity waves and "speed of gravity" questions
  • From: carlip-nospam
• MISUSE OF THE ENERGY MOMENTUM 4 VECTOR EQUATION
  • From: Vert
• Re: The most absurd epicycle ever invented
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Antiworld. Its Inhabitants and the Quantum of Light
  • From: socratus
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Harry
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: bz
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravity waves and "speed of gravity" questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The most absurd epicycle ever invented
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Eht
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof that space is not really empty = eather
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Light so Fast it Travels Backward
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Gravity waves and "speed of gravity" questions
  • From: ajiko
• Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check
  • From: noahdove7
• Light so Fast it Travels Backward
  • From: v4vijayakumar
• Re: Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Hah hah French Bald Bilge was wrong and I was correct hahhahhah haha?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: dda1
• The cause of all frequency shifts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: amir781@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Since the electron's traveling at near "c" then what's it's inertial mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: Igor
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Eht
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: About absolute reference frame......
  • From: Phil
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: Igor
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Igor
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Vert
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Eht
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Mine Unified Field Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: TOTAL FIELD THEORY (Gravity, Electricity & Magnetism are the 4th, 5th & 6th Dimensions)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PARTICLES & WAVES, CONTINUITY & DISCONTINUITY: Unified, Reciprocal, & Complementary
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: hypercubes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• hypercubes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: shevek
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• PARTICLES & WAVES, CONTINUITY & DISCONTINUITY: Unified, Reciprocal, & Complementary
  • From: That Rascal Puff
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• TOTAL FIELD THEORY (Gravity, Electricity & Magnetism are the 4th, 5th & 6th Dimensions)
  • From: That Rascal Puff
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: YBM
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: YBM
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: YBM
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: YBM
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: David
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: David
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: David
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Eht
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Forces of Nature : THE SPIN.
  • From: socratus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: YBM
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Harry
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: RP
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: RP
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: xxein
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: The Four Forces Of Nature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is the electron?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Four Forces Of Nature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: PD
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: YBM
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is the electron?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Igor
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Hexenmeister
• The Four Forces Of Nature
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Faster than light travel possible, is this true guys?
  • From: Spike
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
  • From: sal
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mike
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: PD
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The story about Existence born from Emptiness.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about the color of light in a very dense medium?
  • From: RP
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: RP
• Re: Post #3: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: SR's most basic derivation fault
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR's most basic derivation fault
  • From: Bilge
• Question about the color of light in a very dense medium?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Energy debt and Energy Credit
  • From: acctope
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: David
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: xxein
• SR's most basic derivation fault
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: RP
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Igor
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Usef
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Mike
• Re: What is lightspeed?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Vert
• Re: What is lightspeed?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Le Sage Gravity
  • From: Daniel G. Emilio
• Re: A relativity Paradox
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Can anynone clarify this frequency & velocity relationship for me???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Le Sage Gravity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Orthogonal distance
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• What is lightspeed?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: dda1
• Le Sage Gravity
  • From: Daniel G. Emilio
• Re: What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: dda1
• What are the two kinds of masses ?? (Part 2)
  • From: Nishu
• Re: Post #3: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: dda1
• "Gravity"
  • From: Eht
• Re: Post #3: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A relativity Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Rotating galaxies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• How to Properly Measure Lightspeed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A relativity Paradox
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I wonder if the following is indeed a black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: xxein
• Re: Post #3: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mike
• Re: The story about Existence born from Emptiness.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mike
• Re: Incomplete
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Incomplete
  • From: Nandini
• Incomplete
  • From: Nandini
• Incomplete
  • From: Nandini
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: PD
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Mike
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mike
• Post #3: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• arxiv structure
  • From: trunov
• arxiv structure
  • From: trunov
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The story about Existence born from Emptiness.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• The story about Existence born from Emptiness.
  • From: socratus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Mike
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: Igor
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: We are spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Mike
• We are spacetime
  • From: Ena
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: brodix
• Re: Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: socratus
• Re: Another challenge to tomgee
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Another challenge to tomgee
  • From: Harry
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Local viilage idiot exam results.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: dda1
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Eht
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: By how much can an electron be decelerated???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I have an equation for the mass of the photon!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Another challenge to tomgee
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another challenge to tomgee
  • From: Harry
• Re: Expansion of the universe and creating energy...
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Nishu
• What are the two kinds of Masses ??
  • From: Nishu
• Re: One small Black Hole Bomb could destroy HALF the Earth(& USA)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I wonder if the following is indeed a black hole?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I wonder if the following is indeed a black hole?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I wonder if the following is indeed a black hole?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Harry
• Forces of Nature : THE SPIN.
  • From: socratus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: I wonder if the following is indeed a black hole?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Bilge
• Re: One small Black Hole Bomb could destroy HALF the Earth(& USA)
  • From: Bilge
• I wonder if the following is indeed a black hole?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: One small Black Hole Bomb could destroy HALF the Earth(& USA)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: One small Black Hole Bomb could destroy HALF the Earth(& USA)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• One small Black Hole Bomb could destroy HALF the Earth(& USA)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light (no matter)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: By how much can an electron be decelerated???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Expansion of the universe and creating energy...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: brodix
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: brodix
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Expansion of the universe and creating energy...
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Expansion of the universe and creating energy...
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time has two directions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Expansion of the universe and creating energy...
  • From: roninfromde
• Time has two directions
  • From: brodix
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Igor
• SPIN.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: socratus
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Another challenge to tomgee
  • From: AllYou!
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of
  • From: Eht
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Harry
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I have an equation for the mass of the photon!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Orthogonal distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Fredrik Bulow
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Igor
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: dda1
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: dda1
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: torque
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: torque
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I have an equation for the mass of the photon!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: SLAC/LINAC: please confirm ...
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Length Contraction Fully Explained
  • From: kk
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: PD
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SLAC/LINAC: please confirm ...
  • From: PD
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: PD
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: PD
• Challenges to tomgee
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: Harry
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: David
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of
  • From: Eht
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Bilge
• Re: I have an equation for the mass of the photon!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: I have an equation for the mass of the photon!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Vert
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: FrediFizzx
• The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SLAC/LINAC: please confirm ...
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: Bilge
• SLAC/LINAC: please confirm ...
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: Randy Poe
• Major physics misinterpretations
  • From: mrd
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: Vert
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Vert
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Vert
• Re: SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Chris
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Igor
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Harry
• Re: Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Is this possible in Special Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Someone attempting "time travel"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: David
• Re: How much harm if a missile diffuses a nuclear reaction ten minutes later?
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: By how much can an electron be decelerated???
  • From: PD
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Eht
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time dilation distorts c in local frames
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Jerry
• Challenge to Androcles
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Alex
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is Einstein's Relativity a little Wrong?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How much harm if a missile diffuses a nuclear reaction ten minutes later?
  • From: Chris
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Chris
• Re: Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: eleaticus
• The Twins' "path integral" dilation: ROFFLMFAO!
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Einstein's transformations and vomit
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: photons and energy
  • From: RP
• photons and energy
  • From: David
• Re: Someone attempting "time travel"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: David
• Re: SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• SR: "You can't get there from here!"
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Jerry
• Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: SRian "proper time" versus SRian dilation: ROFFLMFAO!
  • From: xxein
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Chris
• Re: Someone attempting "time travel"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: xxein
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Almost all
  • From: vanep
• Re: Someone attempting "time travel"
  • From: The Mirror
• Re: SRian "proper time" versus SRian dilation: ROFFLMFAO!
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: About absolute reference frame......
  • From: Phil
• Re: Someone attempting "time travel"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Almost all
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: SR is built on false assumptions
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Phil
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: About absolute reference frame......
  • From: Phil
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Someone attempting "time travel"
  • From: The Mirror
• Re: time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• time dilation, again (sorry!)
  • From: freezer
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: David
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Eht
• Re: how is this defined in SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• how is this defined in SR?
  • From: David
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A relativity Paradox
  • From: Runmone
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Vert
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Almost all
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Almost all
  • From: jem
• Re: Maxwells Equations and Gauge Symmetry
  • From: MusicRules
• Re: Almost all
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Almost all
  • From: jem
• Re: Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Photons & SR - how is this resolved by physicists?
  • From: David
• Re: Almost all
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: socratus
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Can Light NOT be Ballistic?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The SRians are making contradictory claims
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The "Harvard" BEER derivation: ROFFLMFAOAPMP!
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SRian "proper time" versus SRian dilation: ROFFLMFAO!
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Almost all
  • From: vanep
• Re: Almost all
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Almost all
  • From: vanep
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: vanep
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: vanep
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SRian "proper time" versus SRian dilation: ROFFLMFAO!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Tom Roberts there seems to be something missing?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Almost all
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Bilge