Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view


"David" <dseppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qr8262pjmjbg2016fg6eo8cen132ckr74u@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Tue, 09 May 2006 17:48:23 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
| <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| >
| >"David" <dseppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i05162lamg3ggsp23vvhkkjlq66l55plla@xxxxxxxxxx
| >> On Mon, 08 May 2006 12:20:42 -0400, sal <pragmatist@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >
| >[snip]
| >
| >> >Oh hogwash. There isn't any "physical" length contraction.
| >> Yes there is. Here's the simple example. Let there be a conveyer
| >> belt moving at 3 meters/second along the x-axis. Let there be two
| >> identical rods, each 100 light-years in length.
| >
| >Two identical rods 100 light-years in length.
| >Another Everyday Experience?
| > http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Everyday2.html
| > http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Everyday.html
| >
| >Dirk Vdm
| Do you harp about the phrasing in that post because English is not
| your native language and you misinterpreted what I stated?

No, it harps because it's a psychopath, a troll and the local village
idiot.
According to Dork, "implies" is a binary operator, not a decision and it
denies causality.
It thinks "If A then B" is false when A = 1 and B = 0. B is never caused by
A.
In other words, all computers using decisions of the type IF.. THEN ..
are screwed up, because IF... THEN.. statements can be false, B
is truely independent of A. So it says things like "xor implies or"
and when you try to explain to it why that is senseless it writes up
a fumble. This makes Dork a hero in the eyes of YBM.
A - Dork says it
B - YBM believes it
The statement "If Dork says it then YBM believes it." is always true.

| As you
| highlighted, "Other than the rod being light-years in length the
| parameters are values that occur in everyday experience". Why do you
| keep claiming I think a rod light-years in length is a parameter that
| occurs in everyday experience when I state that it's not. Is that a
| deficiency in your English skills?

Indirectly, caused by a deficiency of intelligence. Dork passed a test:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/BMCPatrol/Questions.html
When you start first grade arithmetic, you have TWO options
to what 4 equals. Which TWO options are they?
a) 1+3
b) 2+2
c) a and b.

BMC were so impressed by his answers they employed him.

Then Dork told YBM that Androcles didn't get the point.
YBM said "I didn't believe Androcles didn't get the point"
and then to me "You haven't still got the point."
Upon pointing out this contradiction to YBM he replied
"double negation and the verb "believe""
I then pointed out the double negation implied
"I did believe Androcles got the point" and he said
"So what, Dumby".
I said he was self-contradictory and he replied
"This is quite impressive".
In other words they both have the intelligence of untrained gorillas.

Androcles.



.

Relevant Pages