Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 May 2006 05:42:53 -0700
Sue... wrote:
bz wrote:snip
If you want to claim a clock slowed because someone
put a magnet near it, you have tranform back to the
Coulomb gauge where you can model the magnetic force.
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034
BTW... If you have access to:
<< R. V. Pound and J. L. Snider, Effect of Gravity on
Nuclear Resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 539 (1964). [3]
The more accurate measurement with Snider. >>
.... you might find a good example of an atomic clock
that slows when you hold a planet near it.
consistant with logical interpretation described in:
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
Sue...
Sue...
Sue...
[...]
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- References:
- GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: mluttgens
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: mluttgens
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: Sue...
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: bz
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- From: Sue...
- GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity is not science! bill
- Previous by thread: Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- Next by thread: Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
- Index(es):