Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims


bz wrote:
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1148721496.485987.146440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Eric Gisse wrote:
mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

[repost #3, google is being uppity]

GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims

A fascinating assertion, considering general relativity was used in
the design of GPS and the successful explanation of the H&K
observations.

I'm sure this rant will be as based in reality as your others.


"In the GPS, all atomic clocks in all reference frames (in orbit
and on the ground) are set once and stay synchronized.

Off to an excellent start, you already made a gigantic error. Once
the clocks are moved, they are nolonger synchornized.

They need only very small corrections.

Which means they are nolonger synchronized. "Very small" is markedly
different from "none".

Clocks are always moving in 'space time' because they are
defined that way to permit the interchange of spatial and temporal
axes.
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node13.html

To say clocks can't be synchronised because of their motion
is the same as telling a bird hunter his success is a matter
of pure random chance and he need not concern himself
about when he pulls the trigger.


They can be REsyncronized.

but NOT "are set once and stay synchronized"

Frayed knot:
<< Note that even after the Lorentz gauge has been
adopted, the potentials are undetermined to a gauge
transformation using a scalar field, , which satisfies the
sourceless wave equation (1450)
However, if we adopt sensible boundary conditions in
both space and time then the only solution to the above
equation is . () >>
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node118.html

<< The Lorenz gauge is incomplete, in the sense that there
is this residual gauge freedom. However, the gauge degrees
of freedom propagate at the speed of light. In special relativity
this is a covariant gauge. >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_fixing

The gauge is produce by assuming a fixed relation
between time and displacment. You can not, by royal
decree declare something to be a physical 'clock'
and operate on it with 3 space rules.

If you want to claim a clock slowed because someone
put a magnet near it, you have tranform back to the
Coulomb gauge where you can model the magnetic force.
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034

Sue...





Sue...



[...]







--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
    ... QCD is also a gauge theory ... you cannot arrive at general relativity. ... with an absolute time is different than for a relativistic theory. ... >> or are you just opposed to invariance under unitary transforms? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GR ?
    ... we find the gauge function that takes us from the Lorenz gauge ... >>> has been called the special theory of relativity to distinguish it from ... > I am sure she did, they were required by international law. ... >>> As for 'condensers', we still use them in the laboratories, all the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
    ... in the design of GPS and the successful explanation of the H&K ... Once the clocks are moved, ... You have just changed from Lorenz to Coulomb gauge. ... comparison in the Lorenz gauge is usually the reason. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The real real twin paradox.
    ... to appropriate gauge to for testing simultaneity? ... with your interpretation of relativity. ... The unholy mix is in your head, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hobbas misconceptions
    ... >>> without a proof that the result is manifestly covariant. ... > relativity would be falsified. ... Any relativistic gauge theory has to ... >>The regularization problem of chiral gauge theory is not to use some ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)