Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity


"Nicolaaas Vroom" <nicolaas.vroom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:DTFdg.448848$zJ2.11873380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[snip, sorry]

I hope that my description is clear.

Yes, it is very clear, but too long.
I counted 6 places where a relevant comment was called for,
but each comment will lead to another comment from you,
and so on... So we will never make it to the end, alas.


Which is my mistake to solve this apparent conflict ?

Take a large piece of paper and carefully draw a spacetime
diagram. You'll see it immediately.

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just one more anecdote
    ... >So if you mean that the final built database will express all constraints ... I wouldn't qualify ORM as being object-oriented. ... diagram has the closest match to the NIAM mehods. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Darwinists: Answer the god-damn question (please)?
    ... branching pattern of evolution might look. ... If you read the text accompanying the diagram, ... to illustrate the concept of divergence. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Earth curvature
    ... > Motion within the time is shrunken down (sand is observed therefore ... > I think Carroll know he was writing nonsense deliberately. ... Dirk Vdm ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other Peoples Money on
    ... already on the record for saying that there is motion in spacetime. ... There is nothing to be ashamed of in saying that. ... does not think of particles as "moving through" space-time, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
    ... The usual resort of the anti-SR crackpot: call real physicists 'stupid'. ... spacetime, we don't just have one time. ... despite what Popper ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading