Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: "The Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:58:41 GMT
<rotchm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148916378.234523.65290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >Ahem.
| >
| >http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Speed.html
| >http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Velocity.html
|
| Ahem...
|
| Carefull. These are math definitions,not physics definitions.
|
| The 'x' and specially 't' are different in math and phys.
|
| In math (diff. geom.), 't' is a universal parameter. In phys 't' is not
| a universal parameter, but the readings of clocks; it has an
| operational defintion...
Ok, so "physics" doesn't use math in your view.
What do want us to do about it, cry?
You are confusing physics with theoretical phuckwittery.
Androcles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- References:
- On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Sorcerer
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- On The Measurement Of Speed
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativity is not science!
- Next by Date: Re: Spin-Orbit Interaction energy, in which frame is it calculated?
- Previous by thread: Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- Next by thread: Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading