Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:00:19 GMT
On Mon, 29 May 2006 10:13:20 -0700, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ok, so "physics" doesn't use math in your view.
You are wrong. In my view, physics does use math.
Only in the theoretical realm, not in the observational.
I simply stated that some words (concepts) in math have diferent
definitions in physics.
Exactly. Apparently "speed", in physics, is what "velocity" is in
mathematics, according to The Sorcerer/Hexenmeister/Androcles.
This impedes communications a bit, but can't be helped.
The definitions of Position and time in math (diff geom) differ from
the physics definition.
What do want us to do about it, cry?
No. I want you's to note it. Many do not realize it.
He already did. That's why he answered "zero".
Note that Einstein had a similar problem, which was masked during
translation into the English. Most physicists, however, completely ignore
the issue since it's largely irrelevant, and a mirror changes velocity
anyway.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Sorcerer
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- References:
- On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Sorcerer
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: The Sorcerer
- Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- On The Measurement Of Speed
- Prev by Date: Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- Next by Date: Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- Previous by thread: Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- Next by thread: Re: On The Measurement Of Speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
