Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 05:31:58 -0700
Dead Paul wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006 04:26:46 -0700, Sue... wrote:Continuous motion just to permit the interchange of
Electromagetic field equations have to account for volumes of space that
are separated in space or time by interchanging the axes. That is
fundamental to electromagnetic unification.
Questioning how continuum mechanics is applied to such a system I can
fully support. But with a cursory reading, It appers that continuum
mechanics (wave mechanics) is retained and the possibilty of
temporal/spatial interchange is discarded.
yes, that is his overall view i believe.
A universe without magnets ?
Obviously that cannot be.
Something is wrong with one or more theories somewhere.
spatial and temporal axes may seem antithetical to
a backyard hammock but it is the lifeblood of a
magnet.
It is worth considering how 'wave mechanics' would explain a confirmation
of this expeiment: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html
GR would have to make a few minor adjustments. IMHO... it is a theory
based on 'wave mechanics' that would be "demolished".
GR over QM.
That's a new one to me.
I'll have to ponder it.
OK... Ponder how atomic absorption
and emission is related to gravity in Mossbauer type
experiments like Pound-Snider.
Sue...
Sue...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- From: Dead Paul
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- References:
- Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- From: Dead Paul
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- From: Sue...
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- From: Dead Paul
- Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- Prev by Date: Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR
- Next by Date: Re: Photo-electro-magnetic forces
- Previous by thread: Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- Next by thread: Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here
- Index(es):