Re: 2 Paul Marmet (RIP) had alternative theories to SR and GR


Dead Paul wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:50:25 +0200, Harry wrote:


"Dead Paul" <dead_paul@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e5h0js$dcq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul Marmet (RIP) on his website described an alternative explanation
for the muons lifetime increase with velocity based on the principle of
mass-energy equivalence and KE. It looks much more sensible than SR.

Hey, are you pretending to be his incarnation? ;-)

Actually, such explanations can not be in conflict with SR and he wasn't
the first with such an approach. But watch out: probably due to old age he
really lost his mind with "Mathematical Error in the Lorentz
Transformation". Happily you can avoid that delusion by using the way-back
machine of archive.org, down to a web site version from before he messed
up so badly. Or simply limit yourself to reading the stuff that he
actually managed to get published in peer reviewed journals.

Harald

I don't agree with everything he said but the point is his approach to
physics was a reality based one. No mysticism like static 4d spacetime.

Do you have enough mathematical background to tell me what a metric is?

.

Relevant Pages