Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 15:32:39 -0700
Leonard Abbott wrote:
Sue=But that is where timing gets absurd and we have to apply
uncertainty corrections. Some elements are fairly stable some extremely
unstable. I remain unconvinced by your assertion.
------------------------------------------------------
len- time is always related to motion, and inertia, the only way a clock
can be thrown off is by inertia from another source, or direction .
I burn graduated candles for clocks so I wouldn't know about that.
Find way to prevent inertia from another source from influencing Your
clock, and you have created a perfect clock.
I am quite happy with my candles. The scented ones smell
better than that stinky oil they have to put on the mechanical
contraptions.
There is nothing unstable in Inertia. Atoms always behave the same in
regards to inertia.
Is that why standards labs use fountain clocks?
Sue...
len
.
- References:
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
- From: Sue...
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
- From: Leonard Abbott
- Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
- Prev by Date: Re: To Androcles
- Next by Date: Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- Previous by thread: Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
- Next by thread: Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here Sue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|