Re: Cahill on the speed of light (& Einstein)

Dead Paul wrote:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0501051

another excellent paper.

A must read if you think SR is nuts.

--
___ _______ ___ ___ ___ __ ____
/ _ \/ __/ _ | / _ \ / _ \/ _ |/ / / / /
/ // / _// __ |/ // / / ___/ __ / /_/ / /__
/____/___/_/ |_/____/ /_/ /_/ |_\____/____/



http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0501051
The Sagnac effect is not evidece for absolute motion.

Sue...

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space
    ... >> Yes absolute motion can be detected if the right experiment is ... Maybe your grand mather had both pussy and nuts and thus she could make ... > Smarter people than you have been looking for aether and they have not ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space
    ... >> Yes absolute motion can be detected if the right experiment is ... Maybe your grand mather had both pussy and nuts and thus she could make ... > Smarter people than you have been looking for aether and they have not ...
    (sci.physics)