Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- From: "The Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:03:07 GMT
"BernardZ" <bernardZ@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ee80d1ada138f659899d1@xxxxxxx
| In article <1149046688.508095.182340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
| goldenboar@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
| > The Lorentz factor is usually given by the equation:
| >
| > gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
| >
| > or by
| >
| > beta = v/c
| > gamma = 1/sqrt(1-beta^2)
| >
| > The equation can be written in a more intuitive (for me at least) way
| > as shown below:
| >
| > gamma = c / sqrt(c^2 - v^2)
| >
| >
|
| Reminds me of a discussion I had with my engineering professor. I said
| that some units could be better written in a different form. He reckoned
| *so what*.
So what?
Androcles.
|
| --
| Self control is what keeps us from being rapist.
|
| Observations of Bernard - No 100
|
|
.
- References:
- Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- From: Golden Boar
- Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- From: BernardZ
- Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein's clock synchro is hog wash
- Next by Date: Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- Previous by thread: Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- Next by thread: Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|