Re: Einstein-Deconstructed PDF here SUE


Leonard Abbott wrote:
Re: Relativity is not science! surr

Group: sci.physics.relativity Date: Wed, May 31, 2006, 8:16am From:
leonard-abbott@xxxxxxxxx (Leonard Abbott)
----------------------------------------------
Apart from your political biases, tell us why relativity is not science.
Define science. That is, don't mention communism, fascism, God, theism,
or the like, please.
----------------------------------------------
There ar 6 definitions for science in websters dictionary.
I like ''Gaining knowledge by a systematic study'' the most I
like''Mathematical knowledge '' the least because there is no systematic
study associated with math.
there is discussion about math, but little or no systematic study.

Look trough a tellescope into space, you see no triangles or circles.You
see only infinate space.

Non -Euclidean Geometry in particular is lacking ''systematic study.''
or reasons for its acceptance.
Euclidean Axioms were changed, with no experimentation, proving there is
a curvature of straight lines in space, or that Parallel lines cross .

if parallel lines really cross, then their direction could be slightly
changed to
make them parallel again.

A mathematician would never do that because it could not be explained
with geometry.

The first attempts at non-Euclidean Geometry were in Newtons day,
Astronomy was beginning to overshadow Mathematics, to remain important
Non-euclidean geometry was invented.
Here is a little from a web page showing Non-Euclidean Geometry is
anti-systematic study.
'' Meanwhile there is virtually a conspiracy of silence. If we just
don't think--ostrich-like--about facing an infinite universe again, then
it won't happen. This is not intellectually or philosophically honest.
But it is of a piece with much of the way non-Euclidean geometry and its
related cosmological issues have been dealt with for a long time. The
closest we seem to have come to a more open consideration of these
matters is when both Stephen Hawking and Karl Popper [Karl Popper,
Unended Quest, Open Court, 1990; p.16] point out that Einstein, whether
or not he successfully answered Kant's Antinomy of Space, did not answer
the Antinomy of Time: despite decades of everyone glorifying in the
philosophical revelation of a finite but unbounded universe, they simply
didn't notice that the solution proposed for space didn't work with
time.''
If this is true then most of relativity is a hoax,

A new cretin?

.

Relevant Pages