Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity


"Spoonfed" <good4usoul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149090013.773875.219560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| The Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Spoonfed" <good4usoul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > |
| > | I am sorry this makes you sleepy, though, Androcles. I really don't
| > | expect that you'll be able to rouse yourself from your nap long enough
| > | to correct the misinformation about this boring old math problem. But
| > | that's alright. As long as everybody knows you know you're wrong, I
| > | think we'll move forward in understanding you're particular motivation
| > | in posting on this newsgroup.
| > |
| > | The transformation I gave you is a matrix product of two rotations to
| > | move the velocity vector into the x direction, followed by a Lorentz
| > | Transformation,
| >
| > Yawn...


You are spoofing nobody but yourself, foolish Spoof fodder.
Snipping will not make you right, foolish Spoof fodder.
It only displays your foolish and arrogant ignorance, Spoof fodder.
Do you see the thread title? "UNDERSTANDING SR".
How do your foolish cuckoo transformations originate, Spoof fodder?
Androcles.


.