Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- From: "Golden Boar" <goldenboar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2006 12:30:14 -0700
PD wrote:
Golden Boar wrote:
The Lorentz factor is usually given by the equation:
gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
or by
beta = v/c
gamma = 1/sqrt(1-beta^2)
The equation can be written in a more intuitive (for me at least) way
as shown below:
gamma = c / sqrt(c^2 - v^2)
I think it would benefit you to see the form of the Lorentz
transformations in terms of hyperbolic transcendental functions, where
gamma = cosh(rapidity),
about as simple as you can get.
Moreover, the rapidity variable is exceeding useful as well as being
more physically fundamental.
See, for example, http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=312518
The important thing to note is that, rather than reading up on things
that have already been done a long long time ago, you are spending your
time futzing with equations to stumble on the work yourself. This in
itself is not a bad thing. Thinking that you've done something original
or of interest to others --- that you'll find people have a lesser
opinion of.
PD
Hey, I didn't say it was original, and as for it not being of interest
to others, I can say without a doubt in my mind, that somebody
somewhere will find it interesteing.
.
- References:
- Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- From: Golden Boar
- Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- From: PD
- Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- Prev by Date: Re: "Gravity"
- Next by Date: Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
- Previous by thread: Re: Another look at the Lorentz factor.
- Next by thread: Maxwell's vs. Einstein's field equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|