Einstein forgive mine arrogance?
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2006 21:25:47 -0700
Dear Professor Einstein,
Can you explain the Metrics of Space by using the engineering
terminology of a Mesh and it's tensile strength (proportional to the
permitivity of Space or c^2)?
If so, this mesh's very high(1) or low(2) tensile strength would
generate only ONE DOMINANT BEND manifested as a gravitational
attraction between two objects.
***But Professor Einstein, in the real world and LAWS of Engineering
Mechanics:
As Mass increases to a specific value then this same mesh according to
it's tensile strength generates TWO DOMINANT BENDS in which case even
though the proximity remains the SAME, the attraction would CEASE to
exist??
This GR phenomenum would oppose Newtonian Mechanics law where the more
Mass increases then *always* the more attraction?
Sincerely Yours Truly.
(Please disregard those who's *only* reply is that Mesh and Metrics are
not the same, there must be more to this Professor Einstein)
PS: French Bilge and Eric Gisse have a crush on you. Not that there is
anything bent with that?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Einstein forgive mine arrogance?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Einstein forgive mine arrogance?
- From: Joe Jakarta
- Re: Einstein forgive mine arrogance?
- Prev by Date: Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
- Next by Date: Re: What space program has tested time dilation?
- Previous by thread: Re: The photon has zero mass or the cretinism of Y. Porat
- Next by thread: Re: Einstein forgive mine arrogance?
- Index(es):