Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims


"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e5p92d$bmo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
| > I received an E-mail from somebody I don't know. I tried to send him
| > (her)
| > a reponse, but the address seemed to be false.
| >
| > Here are my comments :
| >
| > You are perfectly right. If the ground clocks and the satellite clocks
| > emit the same frequency Nu1, the received signal from the satellite
| > clocks will be Nu2<>Nu1, unless the satellites clocks are "adjusted
| > *once* pre-launch for the predicted relativity effects" (leaving aside
| > small periodic adjustments). Then Nu2=Nu1, an quasi-permanent equality.
| >
| > The classical explanation is indeed that "the satellite clocks speed up
| > because they are higher in the Earth's gravitational field, and slow
| > down because they are moving faster than objects on the Earth's
| > surface". One could as well consider that the moving clocks and
| > the Earth clocks keep ticking at the same rate, but the frequency of
| > the signals emitted by the satellite clocks are *observed* to be
| > blue-shifted by a gain of potential energy, and red-shifted by the
| > longer
| > path travelled by the signal when observed from Earth. The pre-launch
| > adjustment of the frequency of the satellite signals cancel the net
| > effect for the Earth observer.
|
| You are rather confused.

Yeah, but your lies won't help and you are a proven liar.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/LIAR/LIAR.htm
I think you quite simply is to dumb to do.

The advance of longitude of perihelion of Mercury is 43 arc seconds
per century in error using Newtonian Mechanics.
That's
43 *100 /(415 orbits * 360 degrees * 60 arc minutes * 60 arc seconds) =
0.000079949427338985571917298824929347%, which Einstein resolved
using a slide rule and a booklet of log tables, thus proving GR is more
correct that NM.
http://www.sliderules.clara.net/indx01a.jpg

Androcles







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
    ... path travelled by the signal when observed from Earth. ... adjustment of the frequency of the satellite signals cancel the net ... a stationary observer on the ground. ... I will in the following assume that the satellite clock is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Constraints on spatial flatness.
    ... constructed around the observer at the spatial origin. ... clocks we have to start with are at the center of the earth, ... clocks at the signals' reception events. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
Quantcast