Re: Cherenkov Radiation false if light is the smallest mass (quanta)??
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Jun 2006 17:31:23 -0700
Tom Roberts wrote:
[...]
Except, of course, experiments observe Cherenkov radiation all the time,
with properties quite accurately described by the theory.
Such little info has little meaning, it doesn't contest my suspicions.
A minute billiard reaction (as I called it) would still be observable
as a Cherenkov radiation.
You need to ellaborate better, my explanations take but a few
Your word-salad ramblings are useless. You need to _LEARN_ about
physics, and not try to discuss what you so obviously do not understand.
sentences, but they fully explain the steps to the reasoning.
Tom Roberts
.
- References:
- Re: Cherenkov Radiation false if light is the smallest mass (quanta)??
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Cherenkov Radiation false if light is the smallest mass (quanta)??
- Prev by Date: Re: To Androcles
- Next by Date: Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- Previous by thread: Re: Cherenkov Radiation false if light is the smallest mass (quanta)??
- Next by thread: Re: Cherenkov Radiation false if light is the smallest mass (quanta)??
- Index(es):