Re: Sue's Experiment


Hayek wrote:
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Sue took a rubber ***

1. Sue put two balls that always REMAIN 4 inches
apart on the ***

Sue noticed only one dent in the ***

2. Sue increased the size and mass of the balls

Sue noticed one larger dent occured in the ***.

3. Sue increased the mass but not the size.

Sue noticed two full dents in the rubber ***
(dents occur based on the tensile strength or
elasticity of the ***).


4. Sue compared results in #3 with Einstein GR
dented rubber *** model.

Sue noticed that according to that model, two fully
separated dents would suggest no more attraction
between both balls??

Sue noticed a conflict with Newton's law that an
increase of mass(regardless of dimensional size) at
a SAME distance would require more attraction and
not less attraction??

Sue ran to hide because here comes the angry
fundamental critics.


Sue should have been in your message filter.

Uwe Hayek.

--
L'intellectuel qui pense comme autrui ne sert à rien !

This is the bitterest pain among men, to have much
knowledge but no power.
Herodotus (484 BC - 430 BC), The Histories of Herodotus

IDIOCY - Never underestimate the power of stupid
people in large groups.

I agree! Some Hayeks are too stupid and need little wordsto understand,
here's the little words:

"That as mass increases but the two objects remain the SAME VOLUMETRIC
SIZE then Einstein's rubber *** forms TWO completely separated dents
and therefore the force of attraction would decrease and NOT INCREASE
as Newton's Gravity Law demands."

-------------------------------------------------------

Two objects who's distance remains the same on Einstein's rubber ***:

Mass and Size increase = larger "U" = larger attraction
Mass but not size increase = two "U"s = "W" = (double U) = LESS or no
attraction

.

Quantcast