Re: What Exactly Happens to TIME in GPS Orbit?


Henri Wilson schrieb:

On 5 Jun 2006 10:13:38 -0700, "Rudolf Drabek" <newsrudy@xxxxxx> wrote:

Henri Wilson schrieb:

On 1 Jun 2006 16:54:22 -0700, "Rudolf Drabek" <newsrudy@xxxxxx> wrote:


You try to sqeeze out: You can exchange the clocks.
The clocks are adjusted to show no significant phase diff. after one
week of observation.
At least one magnitude lower than the expected/measured result.

Come on! You know that has never been proved to within experimental error.

They both should emit the same number of ticks per EARTH ORBIT PERIOD.

That is wrong but to make it simple I have taken stationary clocks to
eliminate the velocity error. Assume and verify that from two clocks
the one, that is higher -e.g. on top of a high building- is advanced
compared to that at ground floor. As a fact there is no rel movement
between them.

The top one is experiencing less internal compression due to the weaker
gravity.

What is that?

It is also cutting the Earth's fields at a faster rate.

What? earth field gravity? If you agree, then you agree in GR.

I ask you first to stick to the experiment and explain it with your
theory.

If a clock emits more ticks per 'Earth day' when it is raised to a higher
position, it has obviously changed physically.

I think we let it.
The clocks do not change their properties. It's easy to check. You can
exchange the clocks for the same time -e.g. 1week- they have been
separated so after -e.g. 2 weeks- they are again synchronized when
brought together.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahha!

Who are you kidding?

Their RATES should be the same but their READINGS will be different.

May be you misunderstand, so the total experiment once again:

1. In Dallas 2 atomic clocks are synchronized and compared for minimum
1 week to show that the time diff is below 10 ns after this week.
2.Clock_1 is sent to Denver (or 1 mile up) for 1 week and brought back
to Dallas. Clock_1 is 108ns ahead compared to Clock2.
3.Clock_2 is brought to Denver for 1 week and brought back to Dallas.
4.Both clocks show the same time.

Thats all. I'm preparing an experiment that can be executed with a
Xtaloszillator. But first let me calculate the results.
Xtal for the purpose that you can carry out the exp. at home.

Would this convince you that GR is no miracle?
If you agree, that a light beam passing through an accereated lift is
measured "bended"
and this is simple to understand, then you have no argument against GR,
but only in my view.

Rudi

The latter will indicate how much faster the orbiting clock was running during
those two weeks.

Another point that I can accept is, that if you are mixing frames you


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.

.

Quantcast