Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained


"kk" <mr_kurt_kingston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149624386.754913.259400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
| -snip-
|
| Dirk's bluffing.
|
|
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/aafb521cce5847be/eaeb0a4e27c6be0a?q=Clueless+Autistic+Imbecile+&rnum=1#eaeb0a4e27c6be0a
| (click on -show quoted text-)
|
| --kk--

The little skeered pee-puppy likes to yap shrilly and run away.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/fumbleindex.htm

Androcles


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... distances to the end points simultaneously. ... so dt for the measuring events doesn't matter. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... This is a distance of the event E in the S' frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... This is a distance of the event E in the S' frame. ... distances to the end points simultaneously. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... This is a distance of the event E in the S' frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... This is a distance of the event E in the S' frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)