Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:48:43 GMT
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Tom Roberts wrote:In 1920 Einstein attended a conference onyou shrug to claim innocence and ambiguity.
the aether, and made remarks that essentially say that the "aether" of
GR is utterly unlike any other aether, in that it has no physical
properties (density, temperature, pressure, etc.), and no state of rest
can be ascribed to it.
To consider GR as an "aether theory" requires an incredible PUN on the
word that robs it of all meaning. Einstein knew this. But he spoke in
the style of his time, not ours. <shrug>
Not at all. I merely claim Einstein's words do not mean what you think they mean.
Einstein's specific words
to the same link I gave:
"GR without an ETHER IS UNTHINKABLE"
Sure. But simply pulling quotes out of context is useless. You need to _READ_THE_ARTICLE_ and you will see that what I said above is a reasonable synopsis of this aspect of his statements.
Tom Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- References:
- Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: Igor
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: Igor
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Anyone good with Tensors?
- Prev by Date: Artificial quantum physics of time
- Next by Date: Re: Shoot a nail in the middle of a moving 2" X 4" !
- Previous by thread: Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- Next by thread: Re: Anyone good with Tensors?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|