Re: Maxwell's equation suggests absolute space and defy TWO Newton principales


PD wrote:
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
PD wrote:
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
PD wrote:
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Due to permittivity & permeabiltiy being of small values (therefore
light very fast):


Higher velocities in space should INCREASE the permittivity &
permeability factors (let me finish):


People in a mach1 Concord plane would only ***SLIGHTLY*** notice this
(by the ***SLIGHT*** amount they notice they're traveling in curved
space) due to the still very small values of permittivity & permability
of space. Therefore their travel velocity can never be perfectly
straight (curved space, curves faster for them then at a slower
velocity) and can never be perfectly constant, velocity would spiral
down to a stop within a lengthy period of time (the higher the
velocity, the higher the deceleration although the complete stop period
would still be longer than a slower velocity): This would suggest an
absolute relavistic space.

Unfortunately, this is even more incoherent than usual.

Get some sleep and try again, please.

PD

Hey it's only a hypotheses.

OK! Here goes ***BUT*** someone must truly know the answer to the two
small questions below to clearly remove this hypotheses (and if the
answer AGREES with the hypotheses, it could very easily jump from
theory to ********LAW*********(read the question before laughing
please...ohhh too late, read anyway):



Prelude: IMPERMEABLE (permeability) UMBRELLA means the rain traveling
through is impenatratable (likewise many locations permittivity is a
word linked to porosity of a material).

Question (all mediums have a permeability and permittivity):

1. Does a LOW permeability(and permittivity) of a medium have the SAME
EFFECT but LESS then a medium with HIGH permeability (and
permittivity)?

2. What effects occur for mediums with EXTREMELY HIGH PERMEABILITY (and
permittivity), does the uninterrupted velocity of the object(or
electron or photon) travelling through the medium decrease with time,
does the object burn-up (catch fire at specific high velocity) or the
does the medium itself break, melt or burn down?

(Example: a capacitor's dielectric may prematurely rupture only due the
amount of permittivity of it's dielectric, if so what are ALL the
causes: high voltage, high current, high velocity of electron, high
frequency, high kinetic energy, other....?)


(We must be carefull that the effects are not due for other reasons
such as high density, since perhaps most mediums with high permeability
(and permittivity) also have a high density)


This did not help much, sadly.
About the only thing I can pick out of here to respond to is this:
Permeability and permittivity do NOT represent a friction-like drag
coefficient to things traveling through it. A particle traveling
through a dielectric does NOT behave like a space capsule re-entering
Earth's atmosphere. Do not confuse Cerenkov radiation with the heating
of an ablation shield.


I would agree the term is confusing but a dielectric is indeed an
insulator (although some capacitors/batteries discharge with type due
to the pore insulation, yet high permittivity permits a larger static
charge) that permtis some forces to pass and others not to pass hence
the term porosity.

Example: If electrons & protons were positive and negatively charged
balls, and you had a fence whose holes were smaller then the balls in
between them.... then this fence would behave as a dielectric.

But that is NOT how dielectrics work in general.


Batteries and capacitors even self-discharge with time, and this occurs
through the dielectric, the higher the permittivity(such as a thinner
dielectric) the easier for self-discharging, even though higher
permittivity permits a battery or capacitor to hold more charges.

I omitted volume calculations(hence space) for the equations below on
purpose to show the similarities only.

1. Meaning vector(line(2D) or point (1D)) vs vector field(volume(3D))
or energy wave(2D) vs energy field (3D)
2. Or perhaps instead force (total force= total area(=2D)) vs pressure
(force per inch^2 (=1D?))

Therefore omitting the volume calculations:

1. Capacitance = permittivity

2. A little calculations only:

Capacitance = permittivity / thickness

The thicker the dielectric, the less charge can be held
The thicker the medium, the less charge can be held

Therefore the MORE MEDIUM you have the less charge (and charge force).


3. Capacitance = permittvity /thickness x area (same as total Force
(charge force) = pressure x area

((excluding area(2D): insulation or semi-conduction / thickness =
pressure (the thicker the insulation (the medium) the less pressure
can pass through, the more surface area the more pressure can pass true
(thickness of medium(permittivity) x area = 3D space).







The fence is also an insulator, and in electronic terms (DRAM,
Transistors barrier, capacitors, etc...) a SEMI-CONDUCTOR, if a
sufficiently high charge was applied to the fence (too much
protons,electrons), the fence would rupture (couldn't handle the stress
applied to it from the increased force).


google search: dielectric rupture

PD

.

Relevant Pages