Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained

kk wrote:
JanPB claimed-
Forgot to add: this "c+v" simply refers to adding
two velocity vectors in a single reference frame.

Nope.

As Einstein said clearly, it refers to the one-way
speed of a departing light ray as measured in the
carriage frame.

You misunderstood this. Trust me.

The embankment frame got c for the same ray.

Take a course in reading comprehension.

Learn physics before criticising it. You'll get precisely nowhere if
you keep posting your fantasies.

And after you finish the course, maybe you can tell
us how Einstein derived his c±v.

You need to sit down and study this stuff for real. An Internet bboard
won't cut it. You have no clue what's going on here.

You will discover to your undying amazement that he
used the absolutely synchronous clocks of Galileo
and Newton, nonphilosophically, just as I did, contrary
to your prior claim.

Nonsense. I've seen your posts before - you don't understand this
stuff, pure and simple.

And, no, I am not going to pay for your reading
comprehension course, nor for Dirkie's & DaDa's.

Whatever. It's your problem.

--
Jan Bielawski

.

Quantcast