Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: "kk" <mr_kurt_kingston@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jun 2006 10:16:52 -0700
JanPB wrote:
[something tangential re closing velocities]
U brought it up - but - just as I suspected -
U don't want to specify what you're saying
because
U-NO-it's-wrong.
--kk--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: dda1
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: JanPB
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- References:
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: JanPB
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: JanPB
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: JanPB
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: kk
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- From: JanPB
- Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- Prev by Date: Re: Since k varies but not G suggests an Eather
- Next by Date: Re: Since k varies but not G suggests an Eather
- Previous by thread: Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- Next by thread: Re: Length Contraction Fully Explained
- Index(es):