Re: Doppler effect derivation

From: "dda1" <rangeravenger@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 19 Jun 2006 08:45:31 -0700

mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

This is a bunch of disconnected garbage. Lorentz is not a force., etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force

Does that mean that Nizar Hamdam has a point?

Marcel Luttgens

No, it means that "dr." Nizar Hamdan generates worthless papers that
contain carefully hidden flaws.

.

References:
- Doppler effect derivation
  - From: mluttgens
- Re: Doppler effect derivation
  - From: Vert
- Re: Doppler effect derivation
  - From: Phineas T Puddleduck

Prev by Date: Re: Since k varies but not G suggests an Eather
Next by Date: Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
Previous by thread: Re: Doppler effect derivation
Next by thread: Re: Doppler effect derivation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread