Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:09:31 +0100
In article <1150747639.739932.71990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"T Wake" <Usenet.es7AT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_PadnZ8SZZVyfgvZRVny0A@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150701797.554880.126730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Twin's Paradox cannot be resolved even through GR.
Are you still going on about this nonsense? You have invented a straw man
and intend to beat it constantly.
Talking about the issue SR has problems in is not nonsense.
Not when the only person with issues is you...
--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
Official emperor of sci.physics. Please pay no attention to my *** poking
forward, it is expanding.
Relf's Law?
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- References:
- Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- Prev by Date: Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- Next by Date: Re: Why does Capacitance decrease with "r" but F decreases with "r^2"?
- Previous by thread: Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- Next by thread: Re: TWIN PARADOX AND EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ABSURDITY
- Index(es):