Re: Scientific exorcism


Julian Becker wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:44:15 +0200, dda1 <rangeravenger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Julian Becker aka Motherfucker wrote:

But what he did is: he said that it be one in "which the equations
of Newtonian mechanics hold good", i.e. in which the Newtonian
axioms hold good. So when Einstein later finds that time is not
absolute this only shows, that Newtonian Axioms have been
inconsikistenly applied in his thought process.

Umm, you don't understand what you are saying. Einstein didn't say what
you attribute him to have said. The above is the product of your
cretinoid brain. If you quote, quote correctly, ShitForBrains

have a look at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Kinematical part, §1, first sentence. OR if you'd like to stick to
the original (e.g. at http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/files/1905_17_891-921.pdf),
it sais:
"Es liege ein Koordinatensystem vor, in welchem die Newtonschen mechanischen Gleichungen gelten."


No persistent idiot , the error is attributting Einstein what follows:

"So when Einstein later finds that time is not
absolute this only shows, that Newtonian Axioms have been
inconsikistenly applied in his thought process. "

.

Quantcast