Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.


Henry Haapalainen wrote:
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> kirjoitti viestissä
news:bp5u929ssf9npss2i5m9at1oljkhj5v78n@xxxxxxxxxx
Before Einstein, Lorentz's aether theory satisfactorily explained the MMX
null
result via his LTs. However, in spite of this, the null result was still
taken
as sound evidence that no aether exists. That is still the official
verdict.

It is a fact, that because of Lorentz's (Fitzgerald's) supposed
'contractions',
it is a feature of LET that any observer moving through the aether will
always
MEASURE the OW speed of light as being c.

Einstein's master stroke was to turn the whole theory back to front. He
BEGAN
with the idea of CONSTANT MEASURED OWLS as a postulate. Thus, it seemingly
didn't matter if an aether existed or not, particulalry after he concocted
his
outlandish definition of clock synchronisation, (which just happens to be
correct according to the Ballistic theory of light).

Einstein plodded his way backwards and ended up formulating exactly the
same
mathematical theory that Lorentz had previously produced. ..although his
'contractions were observational rather than physical.

The problem was, in Einstein's case, there was NO physical connection with
the
real world. If one actually wants to delve more deeply into any of the
claims
of relativity one must resort to the existence of an aether, which of
course is
what Einstein believed in himself.

For instance if one asks, "why is OWLS always SUPPOSEDLY measuresd as
being
'c'?, the answer is, "BECAUSE AN ABSOLUTE AETHER EXISTS AND THE LTs
APPLY".....OR, "how can light from differently moving sources end up
travelling
through space at the same speed?", the answer is, "BECAUSE THERE IS AN
ABSOLUTE
AETHER THAT DETERMINES LIGHT SPEED".
Another is, "how can contractions that are merely observational, become
real
physical effects?". Again, the answer is "there has to be an absolute
reference
frame".

There are no other answers.
Even his velocity addition equation is a direct consequence of LET
concepts.

Einstein was a huckster and a plagiariser and achieved fame through his
deviousness. In reality, he produced absolutely nothing that was either
novel
or was to ultimately advance the cause of physics.

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein discovered that an attraction between masses is a wrong idea. It is
a significant discovery. Falling objects are in free fall because of the
curvature of space. Then he made mistakes in trying to explain that.

Yet for all your idiotic posting, you have not once proven that general
relativity is not an accurate model of reality.

I asked this of you months ago and you simply refused.


Henry Haapalainen

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... Einstein plodded his way backwards and ended up formulating exactly the ... The problem was, in Einstein's case, there was NO physical connection with ... ABSOLUTE ... Another is, "how can contractions that are merely observational, become ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: "Einsteins Unfortunate Legacy #1"
    ... Dr. Einstein is credited with being a modern Newton who provided a sea ... change shift in our understanding of physical reality. ... Lorentz Transformation for Velocity is the Lorentz Transformation for Length ... E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Newton and Einstein on the multiple natures of space and time
    ... >> I think it is clear that both Newton and Einstein were very aware ... > believed in Absolute space and time (and by implication, ... Absolute space, in its own nature, without relation to anything ... because Einstein made the assertion that we should ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!
    ... I have been wrong about Einstein for a long time. ... >> clocks ABSOLUTELY. ... This is true because light is source dependent and travel ... >> Apparently Einstein was also quite aware that TIME is absolute and universal. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Christmas vs "Holidays"
    ... > I am claiming that there is more to Reality than meets the eye. ... > had begun to speak of clocks that moved backward, mass that was not ... Einstein was not the first to suggest an increase in inertial resistance ... > How many of your synapses were pre-programmed at birth? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)