Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: "Rudolf Drabek" <newsrudy@xxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2006 11:11:30 -0700
dda1 schrieb:
Rudolf Drabek wrote:
<amateur nonsense snipped.
Where is the nonsense? please help an amateur.
It was carried out, it has been carried out for ages.I don't want to pay 23US$ for this article.
Here is a newer one:
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v42/i2/p731_1?qid=6c4ab66eee46e0e8&qseq=4&show=30
Why do we still have a discussion about this topic in this group in yr
view?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: dda1
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Prev by Date: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
- Next by Date: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Previous by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Next by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Index(es):
