Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.


Sorcerer wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151496744.924923.260870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1151443331.684517.255630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:1151431530.173601.106530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | >
| > | > PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
| > "*exactly*
| > | > what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because no
| > matter
| > | > how
| > | > you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the
typical
| > | > shithead
| > | > and arsehole.
| > | > Androcles
| > |
| > | In your case, Androcles, it's pretty plain what's wrong with your
| > | thinking. It's a pretty short trip following your thinking before you
| > | run into something that's patently wrong.
| > |
| > | Like how muons that are superluminal will leave the same amount of
| > | energy in a scintillator regardless of their initial speed, and still
| > | come out to be just under c by the time they leave the scintillator.
| > | You say, "I don't know HOW it does that, but it's sure more believable
| > | than time dilation." Apparently, to spit out something you thing is
| > | hogwash, you'd be happy to swallow something from further down the
| > | colon.
| > |
| >
| > I was talking about you, not to you.
| > You say a muon slows down in a scintillator
|
| I did? Where did I say that?
| Liar.
"Like how muons that are superluminal will leave the same amount of
energy in a scintillator regardless of their initial speed, and still
come out to be just under c by the time they leave the scintillator." -
***.

I was referring to YOUR thinking, not mine, Androcles. Pay attention.
Wipe the foam off your mouth, too, it's gotten on your glasses and
impaired your reading.





|
| >and you don't know how
| > it does that,
|
| I don't? Where did I say that?
| Liar.

Oh, you do know how they lose energy without slowing down.... do tell us
all, ***.

I know how they lose energy when they slow down. I didn't say that I
don't know how it does that. You did. Would you like a reference to
where you said that?



|
| >so it must have gone in at just under c = 0/0 and come
| > out at c = 1/0. <shrug>
|
| c = 299,792,458 m/s (or 1, depending on your system of units).
| Are you a bonehead, Androcles? Why yes, yes, I believe you are.

See what I mean? No matter how you argue with him, he'll always be right in
his eyes.
He is the typical shithead and arsehole.
The speed of light from A to B is AB/(tB-tA) = 299,792,458 m/s

Yes indeed.

whereas c from A to A is 0/(t'A-tA) = 0/0 m/s.

No, that's not a speed during a round-trip, that's the magnitude of the
velocity on a round-trip. Do you not know the difference?

You're a math major. You know the difference between an average of
magnitudes and a magnitude of an average?

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
Everybody knows a constant velocity reverses direction, don't you, Phuckwit
***?
Us boneheads will continue with speed of light from A to B is AB/(tB-tA) =
299,792,458 m/s

That's fine.

leaving you phuckwits in the dust.

Androcles.

.

Loading