Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:l8e3a2dg48lfg1l2f786t4puv9a0s069p3@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:29:18 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >news:1151431530.173601.106530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >|
| >| PD wrote:
| >| > Henri Wilson wrote:
| >| > > Before Einstein, Lorentz's aether theory satisfactorily explained
the
| >MMX null
| >| > > result via his LTs. However, in spite of this, the null result was
| >still taken
| >| > > as sound evidence that no aether exists. That is still the official
| >verdict.
| >| >
| >| > The reason for that decision is the later experimental confirmation
of
| >| > SR predictions that Lorentz's ether theory does NOT predict.
| >| >
| >| If it were true that decision is taken as HW asserts, it would be wrong
| >| then
| >| and still is wrong. Fortunately for the world, that is not the
| >| official verdict to
| >| physicists, only to those pseudophysicists who frequent these ngs, like
| >| you.
| >|
| >| For some psychological reason, you wish to believe that verdict is
| >| true. It
| >| isn't, and that makes you the laughing stock of the physics community.
| >| > >
| >| > > It is a fact, that because of Lorentz's (Fitzgerald's) supposed
| >'contractions',
| >| > > it is a feature of LET that any observer moving through the aether
| >will always
| >| > > MEASURE the OW speed of light as being c.
| >| > >
| >| > > Einstein's master stroke was to turn the whole theory back to
front.
| >He BEGAN
| >| > > with the idea of CONSTANT MEASURED OWLS as a postulate. Thus, it
| >seemingly
| >| > > didn't matter if an aether existed or not, particulalry after he
| >concocted his
| >| > > outlandish definition of clock synchronisation, (which just happens
to
| >be
| >| > > correct according to the Ballistic theory of light).
| >| >
| >| > Then it isn't outlandish, is it?
| >| >
| >| Wrong again. It isn't that now that you've gotten indoctrinated with
| >| it, but at
| >| the time it came out it was indeed extremely unusual and bizarre.
| >|
| >
| >Phuckwit Duck:
| > " I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.
| >
| > I had hoped that we could fight ignorance with a proactive rather
| > than a reactive approach, but this is clearly the improper forum for
| > that. A quick survey of the length of threads initiated by or drifting
| > to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking
| > reveals the true interest in the proposal.
| >
| > While it would be a useful project to contribute to the FAQ, the
| > intent was to educate in the context of discussion, a virtual
| > "classroom" if you will. There's no point in contributing to a
| > reference that none of the "students" will read or attempt to learn
| > from. The intention was to focus on *exactly* what is wrong in
| > someone's thinking (which varies from person to person), set it
| > straight, and then make progress from there.
| >
| > I had high hopes -- really -- that perhaps one misguided soul would
| > read something sensible and say, "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was
| > confused. OK, I get it now. Now what about...?" My head knew better,
| > my heart does not.
| >
| > [sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to
| > appear]"
| >-- Phuckwit Duck.
| >
| >PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing "*exactly*
| >what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because no matter
| >how
| >you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the typical
| >shithead
| >and arsehole.
|
| ...and leader of the SRian baboon brigade, a pathetic collection of
| self-opiniated would-be's who just don't have any scientifric ability.
|

He is certainly the most vociferous at the moment. I guarantee he'll
snip when cornered by logic he cannot respond to in any other way.

A non-partisan lurker would instantly see that, so I have no idea what
he hopes to gain by snipping, that is the least persuasive argument of all.
Few of the shitheads will respond to me anymore, they know when
they are up against a heavyweight. Let them collaborate and form a
joint opinion, I'll take them ALL on, from Baez to Roberts to all the way
down to the lightweights Spookfood and Gisse.
Androcles.





.

Quantcast