Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Jun 2006 21:06:47 -0700
Igor wrote:
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Make up your mind. Are you talking about electric charge or quark
color?
Both I guess? The color holds the protons, the protons hold the
electrons?
But by the time you get to the level of the proton itself, there's no
net color. It's all internal.
It's impossible to have a nucleus of only photons, my weak memory
therefore presumes the gluon interaction cannot occur with only
photons, therefore the neutrons through the gluon exchange hold the
protons together?
No, gluons are exchanged between quarks. And it's this combination of
quarks and gluons that make up the nucleons. The force holding the
nucleons together, strong as it is, is merely a residual force much
like Van der Waals.
residual of which force (the force of the gluons?)?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: Igor
- Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: Igor
- Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- From: Igor
- It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- Prev by Date: Re: Since k varies but not G suggests an Eather
- Next by Date: Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory
- Previous by thread: Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- Next by thread: Re: It seems that ALL atoms are charged capacitors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading