Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: "Vert" <avergon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jun 2006 07:59:06 -0700
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1150937580.616906.161700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,VERGON
Vert <avergon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
Light does not have mass. Otherwise, the EM force would not be infinite
in extent. So your up-to-date physicists must be from 1890...
Vergon
Why not? A body in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted upon by
a force.
Sound familiar?
Light has energy. Light has momentum. Both energy and momentum possess
mass and motion. ALL equations for momentum and energy contain two and
only two elements -- mass and motion .
Read up on the standard model. You misintrepret momentum.
Really? Then why don't you straighten me out and explain momentum
without mass?
Don't make criticisims that are not backed up. To do so is to simply
shoot your mouth off.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- References:
- "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Yad
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Vert
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: dda1
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: dda1
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Vert
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: dda1
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Vert
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Vert
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- Prev by Date: Re: Since k varies but not G suggests an Eather
- Next by Date: Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
- Previous by thread: Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- Next by thread: Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|