Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:59:31 GMT
"Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:S4qdnSbsaL-vRT_ZRVnyug@xxxxxxxxx
|
| "Rudolf Drabek" <newsrudy@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151516048.818174.99200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| This matter is not solved in this group.
| It may be that it is solved, but I don't know the source.
| One link I've found but can't recover, was optical with interference.
| The various techs to measure c are, except of Römer, TWLS.
|
|
| The speed of light has been exactly 299,792,458 metres per second
| since 1983, by definition.
|
| Martin Hogbin
Relative to the source. You forgot to add that, shithead.
Androcles
.
- References:
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Martin Hogbin
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Prev by Date: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Next by Date: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Previous by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Next by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Index(es):