Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: "dda1" <rangeravenger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2006 19:31:05 -0700
Rudolf Drabek wrote:
So please tell me where is my fault in the setup .
In my view it's a OWLS measurement solution.
Rudi
You error is that you are wasting your time, professionals have already
done it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- References:
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Prev by Date: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by Date: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Previous by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Next by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
