Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group


"Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:GdidnUTzu8C7nj7ZRVnyvw@xxxxxxxxx

"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:29Aog.490381$tc.340219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Rudolf Drabek" <newsrudy@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151516048.818174.99200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This matter is not solved in this group.
It may be that it is solved, but I don't know the source.
One link I've found but can't recover, was optical with interference.
The various techs to measure c are, except of Römer, TWLS.

Oh, do come off it, Rudi. All it takes is an oscilloscope and a couple
of phototransistors, I've measured the speed of light myself.
c is a different matter.

You could not even measure the speed of a train.

It seems he's back - after getting banned from the Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Der_alte_Hexenmeister
And so he changed his name back into Sorcerer.
What a pathetic little *** :-)

Dirk Vdm


.