Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.




kenseto wrote:
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:bp5u929ssf9npss2i5m9at1oljkhj5v78n@xxxxxxxxxx
Before Einstein, Lorentz's aether theory satisfactorily explained the MMX
null
result via his LTs. However, in spite of this, the null result was still
taken
as sound evidence that no aether exists. That is still the official
verdict.

It is a fact, that because of Lorentz's (Fitzgerald's) supposed
'contractions',
it is a feature of LET that any observer moving through the aether will
always
MEASURE the OW speed of light as being c.


This is wrong. OWLS never been measured.

Of course it's been measured.

Now, you may object that it's not been measured using a distance
measured with sticks and two clocks at either end, but that's not the
only way to measure OWLS.

Deciding to measure it some way other than the way you want it to be
measured is probably a good decision.

PD

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Does the Electron Neutrino Have Mass and Charge?
    ... > kenseto wrote: ... > don't dare to speak up" are also a nice sign of that. ... > and synchromized clocks? ... You said that measuring OWLS is a waste of time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space
    ... >> In sci.physics, kenseto ... > That's the point of the OWLS experiment and that's the ... such a fashion as to allow for the creation of gamma rays ... All other clocks launched for the GPS constellation were slowed ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space
    ... >> In sci.physics, kenseto ... > That's the point of the OWLS experiment and that's the ... such a fashion as to allow for the creation of gamma rays ... All other clocks launched for the GPS constellation were slowed ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally.
    ... > kenseto wrote: ... >> procedure) for a different spatial distance between the two clocks to ... > that isn't trying to measure OWLS and THAT is a universal ... synchronized clocks is not 299,792,458m/second. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally.
    ... > kenseto wrote: ... >> procedure) for a different spatial distance between the two clocks to ... > that isn't trying to measure OWLS and THAT is a universal ... synchronized clocks is not 299,792,458m/second. ...
    (sci.physics)

Quantcast