Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: "Rudolf Drabek" <newsrudy@xxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jun 2006 10:01:14 -0700
dda1 schrieb:
Rudolf Drabek wrote:|> The discussion was ended long ago by the experiments quoted .
Thank you for your comment. What I want to achieve is to have an end of
discussion in this group.
This is the only one sense of this design of the experiment.
Rudi
Several
|> times.
So, why in your opinion it's still under discussion in this group?
I assume that the Newtonians are not imbecile. May be they want to
provocate.
Only Androcles reacted regarding the Cassini mission but I understand
not all at the moment. Cassini can also be used for my experiment.
|> Do you get ?
Not yet, I only learned that OWLS has its difficulties, see also this
thread.
I only wanted to have an end of the discussion in this group about
c+-v.
So I tryed it. Thats all.
Rudi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: stephen
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- References:
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- From: dda1
- c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
- Next by Date: Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle
- Previous by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Next by thread: Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
- Index(es):