Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names

In article <1151689793.883794.148120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message
news:290620062334517523%phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0143-0807/26/6/S09/ejp5_6_s09.pdf

Here are my repsonses to Mr. Raine's papaer above. Although I cannot
say for all cranks, this crank is a little bit different from the rest.
After all, it is a rather interesting article without addressing much
physics or mathematical issues.


<LOONEY TUNES SNIPPED>

Thank you for proving the paper by example.

--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.

e=pc and p=hk

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.

Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my *** poking forward, it is expanding.

Relf's Law?
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.