sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• The phrase 'dark matter', stephen
  • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', stephen
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', socratus
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', Randy Poe
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', tomgee
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', Randy Poe
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', tomgee
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', Randy Poe
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', Randy Poe
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', dlzc
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', stephen
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', dlzc
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', tomgee
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', The Real Chris
      • Re: The phrase 'dark matter', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Space-time and time dilation, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Rudi Menter
  • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Sue...
  • Henry Haapalainen - the Fucking Imbecile Strikes Again, dda1
  • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Mdmeenken
    • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, PD
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, PD
  • Re: Space-time and time dilation, PD
    • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, PD
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, PD
      • Re: Space-time and time dilation, xxein
  • Re: Space-time and time dilation, Igor
• Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking., socratus
• Clock Properties, David
  • Re: Clock Properties, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Clock Properties, Sorcerer
    • Re: Clock Properties, guido
      • Re: Clock Properties, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Clock Properties, Sue...
      • Re: Clock Properties, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Clock Properties, David
      • Re: Clock Properties, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Clock Properties, Sue...
  • Re: Clock Properties, Sue...
  • Re: Clock Properties, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• (OT) Moderator Vacancy Announcement: sci.physics.plasma, Martin X. Moleski, SJ
• derivation of kinetic energy, castertroy14
  • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, castertroy14
      • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, castertroy14
      • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, castertroy14
      • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, Bilge
  • Re: derivation of kinetic energy, jem
• Ajudem a defender a democracia!, Gamer
• Re: tha still wrongness of relativity, Igor
  • Re: tha still wrongness of relativity, Paul Cardinale
  • Message not available
    • Re: tha still wrongness of relativity, Igor
• Achille and the turtle....., marcofuics
• Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
  • Marcel Luttgens - Persistent Shit Eater, dda1
  • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Harry
  • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, PD
    • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, PD
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sorcerer
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, PD
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Marcel Luttgens - Shit Eater, dda1
      • Message not available
      • Re: Marcel Luttgens - Shit Eater, dda1
      • Message not available
      • Re: Marcel Luttgens - Shit Eater, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, John C . Polasek
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Harry
  • Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading, Sue...
• How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, PD
    • Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, PD
      • Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?, Peter Christensen
  • Message not available
    • Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?, Peter Christensen
  • Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?, Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?, Peter Christensen
• Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR., LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR., FrediFizzx
    • Re: Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR., LEJ Brouwer
• How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??, PD
    • Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??, jcon
      • Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: puzzle in relativity, puppet_sock
  • Re: puzzle in relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY, surrealistic-dream
  • Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY, Phineas T Puddleduck
• Updated theory, dwhig265
  • Higginbottom - Bottom Head, dda1
  • Re: Updated theory, Sorcerer
  • Re: Updated theory, Phineas T Puddleduck
• Is there Pions in the nucleus??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, Igor
    • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, Igor
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, Igor
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, Igor
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, Igor
      • Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??, Igor
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Tde
• The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", G. L. Bradford
  • Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", Sorcerer
    • Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", xxein
      • Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", Sorcerer
      • Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", xxein
      • Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", Sorcerer
      • Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c", xxein
• Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, goodbyeblueskye
• Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, Sue...
  • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, xxein
    • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, Sue...
      • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, xxein
      • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, Sue...
      • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, xxein
  • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, Joe Jakarta
    • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?, xxein
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Lij
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Igor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Sue...
      • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Sorcerer
      • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Sue...
      • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Sorcerer
• Space-Time Is Not Curved?, G. L. Bradford
  • Re: Space-Time Is Not Curved?, Sorcerer
  • Re: Space-Time Is Not Curved?, Bill Hobba
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Moc
• Mass, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: Mass, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Mass, Y.Porat
    • Re: Mass, Y.Porat
      • Re: Mass, Golden Boar
      • Re: Mass, Y.Porat
      • Re: Mass, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Mass, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Mass, Y.Porat
      • Re: Mass, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Mass, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Mass, Golden Boar
      • Re: Mass, Y.Porat
    • Re: Mass, dda1
  • Re: Mass, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Mass, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Mass, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Mass, Bilge
  • Re: Mass, dda1
  • Re: Mass, PD
    • Re: Mass, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Mass, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Mass, Y.Porat
• A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
  • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Sue...
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, mluttgens
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, mluttgens
  • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Bilge
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Bilge
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
  • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, dda1
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, dda1
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Zanket - a Motherfucking IDIOT, dda1
      • Re: Zanket - a Motherfucking IDIOT, Zanket
  • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
  • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Sorcerer
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Zanket
      • Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications, Dirk Van de moortel
• Let's try a similar experiment (Was: ANYONE CAN BECOME A RELATIVITY HYPNOTIST), Jim Black
  • Re: Let's try a similar experiment (Was: ANYONE CAN BECOME A RELATIVITY HYPNOTIST), Jim Black
• Communications, Joe
  • Re: Communications, Sorcerer
  • Re: Communications, Sue...
  • Re: Communications, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Communications, Sue...
  • Re: Communications, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Communications, Joe
      • Re: Communications, Sorcerer
      • Re: Communications, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Communications, Bilge
• Answer this question Porat, Golden Boar
  • Re: Answer this question Porat, vertvergon
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations 5", Lij
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., shuba
  • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Jerry
    • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Jerry
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., shuba
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Jerry
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Max Keon
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., shuba
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Max Keon
      • Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., shuba
• Re: human hands emit invisible energy, Phineas T Puddleduck
• "Corrections to Special Relativity 5", Lij
• Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Phineas T Puddleduck
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Koobee Wublee
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, shuba
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Sue...
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Bilge
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Bilge
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Sue...
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Sue...
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Sabbir Rahman - Inept Arrogant, passes himself as physicist, dda1
      • Re: Sabbir Rahman - Inept Arrogant, passes himself as physicist, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Sabbir Rahman - Inept Arrogant, passes himself as physicist, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Koobee Wublee
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Sabbir Rahman - Shit Head, dda1
      • Re: Sabbir Rahman - Shit Head, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Sabbir Rahman - Shit Head, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Sabbir Rahman - Endgame Exposed !!!, dda1
      • Re: Sabbir Rahman - Endgame Exposed !!!, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Message not available
    • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, dda1
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, JanPB
      • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?, Tom Roberts
• Re: 'fast' rotating planet effects?, martin . winer
• Where is the flaw?, cafeinst
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, PD
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, Randy Poe
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, cafeinst
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, cafeinst
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, cafeinst
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, cafeinst
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, cafeinst
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, xxein
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Koobee Wublee - SHIT EATER, dda1
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, PD
      • Koobee - Persistent Shit Eater, dda1
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Bilge
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Igor
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
  • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
    • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • An enlightening exercise motivated by Androcles, Spoonfed
      • Re: An enlightening exercise motivated by Androcles, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: An enlightening exercise motivated by Androcles, Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Spoonfed
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sue...
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, Sorcerer
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, jt64
      • Re: Where is the flaw?, jt64
• Abbe George Lemaitre, Jim O'Reilly
  • Re: Abbe George Lemaitre, shuba
    • Re: Abbe George Lemaitre, Jim O'Reilly
• Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory, Spoonfed
  • Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory, Sorcerer
    • Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory, Spoonfed
      • Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory, Sorcerer
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? 5", Lij
• A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, titus_piezas
  • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, Sue...
  • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, shuba
  • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, AllYou!
  • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, Sorcerer
  • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment, titus_piezas
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Henry Haapalainen
    • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Phineas T Puddleduck
    • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Bill Hobba
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Bill Hobba
  • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, kenseto
    • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Spoonfed
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Igor
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
    • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Eric Gisse
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, PD
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
  • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!, Sorcerer
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?, tomgee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Phineas T Puddleduck
  • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, PD
    • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Sorcerer
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, PD
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Sorcerer
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, PD
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Sorcerer
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, PD
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Sorcerer
      • Re: How Long since PD had a job?, Eric Gisse
• Phineas T Puddluduck, dwhig265
  • Re: Phineas T Puddluduck, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Phineas T Puddluduck, Phineas T Puddleduck
  • Re: Phineas T Puddluduck, dda1
• Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, PD
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, PD
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Sorcerer
  • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, PD
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, PD
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Igor
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, oriel36
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, Phineas T Puddleduck
    • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?, oriel36
• Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group?, Joe Jakarta
• Gravity Probe B, mluttgens
  • Re: Gravity Probe B, Sue...
    • Re: Gravity Probe B, mluttgens
    • Re: Gravity Probe B, vanep
      • Re: Gravity Probe B, Sue...
    • Re: Gravity Probe B, Joe Jakarta
      • Re: Gravity Probe B, Sue...
      • Re: Gravity Probe B, Joe Jakarta
      • Re: Gravity Probe B, Sue...
      • Re: Gravity Probe B, Joe Jakarta
  • Re: Gravity Probe B, JanPB
• Open season on crackpots, dda1
  • Re: Open season on crackpots, Phineas T Puddleduck
    • Re: Open season on crackpots, dda1
  • Re: Open season on crackpots, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Open season on crackpots, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Open season on crackpots, Bilge
    • Re: Open season on crackpots, dda1
  • Re: Open season on crackpots, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Open season on crackpots, dda1
  • Re: Open season on crackpots, vertvergon
    • Open season on crackpots - go get Vertner Vergon, the biggest CRETIN, dda1
• Relativity, Douglas Rudd
  • Re: Relativity, Sue...
    • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
    • Re: Relativity, Douglas Rudd
      • Re: Relativity, Sue...
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
  • Re: Relativity, dda1
  • Re: Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
    • Re: Relativity, Douglas Rudd
      • Re: Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Relativity, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, PD
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, PD
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, PD
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
      • Re: Relativity, PD
      • Re: Relativity, Igor
  • Re: Relativity, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
  • Re: Relativity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Relativity, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Relativity, Bilge
  • Re: Relativity, Alex
    • Re: Relativity, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Relativity, Sorcerer
  • Re: Relativity, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Relativity, surrealistic-dream
    • Re: Relativity, Bilge
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter 5", Lij
  • Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter 5", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter 5", Peter Christensen
• Re: Unfication of Physics, Mr . Whiffle
• Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Peter Christensen
  • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), PD
  • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Peter Christensen
  • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Bilge
    • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Peter Christensen
      • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Bilge
      • Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy), Peter Christensen
• AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, PD
    • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Eric Gisse
    • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, PD
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, PD
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Joe Fischer
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, fellowgoodnice
  • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, fellowgoodnice
  • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Tom Roberts
    • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, BernardZ
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Eric Gisse
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, BernardZ
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, bernardz
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Eric Gisse
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, PD
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, bernardz
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Eric Gisse
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, BernardZ
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Tom Roberts
    • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Sorcerer
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, The Real Chris
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Sorcerer
    • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Eric Gisse
      • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, Tom Roberts
      • "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts, Sorcerer
      • Re: "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts, dlzc
      • Re: "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts, Sorcerer
      • Re: "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts, dlzc
  • Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!, marcofuics
• Re: Is Ann Coulter the media?, xxein
  • Re: Is Ann Coulter the media?, johnreynolds2222
• amplitude of a photon, robert
  • Re: amplitude of a photon, Phineas T Puddleduck
    • Re: amplitude of a photon, robert
      • Re: amplitude of a photon, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: amplitude of a photon, xxein
      • Re: amplitude of a photon, dda1
      • Re: amplitude of a photon, FrediFizzx
  • Re: amplitude of a photon, FrediFizzx
    • Re: amplitude of a photon, Sue...
  • Re: amplitude of a photon, Sue...
  • Re: amplitude of a photon, Sorcerer
  • Re: amplitude of a photon, PD
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: amplitude of a photon, Sue...
  • Re: amplitude of a photon, Tom Roberts
    • Re: amplitude of a photon, PD
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, David
  • Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, Todd
    • Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, David
      • Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, Todd
      • Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, David
      • Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, Todd
      • Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers, David
• Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality., Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality., YBM
    • Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality., xxein
  • Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality., xxein
  • Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality., Phineas T Puddleduck
• Voyager spacecraft anomaly, Prometheus
  • Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly, xxein
  • Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly, xxein
  • Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly, Prometheus
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Eric Gisse
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, mluttgens
  • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
    • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Henri Wilson - Perenial Cretin, dda1
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, Randy Poe
• [I just happened to see this], Sorcerer
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist, dda1
• Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • Nizar Hamdan - fraud, dda1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Nizar Hamdan - fraud, dda1
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter, dda1
  • Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter/fraud, dda1
    • Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter, dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
  • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, dda1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, dda1
      • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, nhamdan2
      • Re: N.hamdan - shameless self advertiser, dda1
  • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, dda1
    • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, dda1
  • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
    • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, dda1
    • Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser, dda1
• Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names, Bilge
  • Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names, Bilge
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Bilge
• Re: johnreed take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr
• Sagnac, Douglas Rudd
  • Re: Sagnac, dda1
  • Re: Sagnac, Sue...
    • Re: Sagnac, xxein
      • Re: Sagnac, Sue...
  • Re: Sagnac, Sorcerer
• Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law, nhamdan2
  • Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", dda1
    • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", dda1
    • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", dda1
    • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", dda1
    • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers", dda1
  • Re: Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law, Phineas T Puddleduck
  • Re: Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, dda1
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, Bilge
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers, dda1
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers, nhamdan59
      • Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers, dda1
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers, nhamdan59
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Nizar Hamdan - simply moron, dda1
      • Nizar Hamdan : crackpot, dda1
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron, dda1
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron, dda1
      • Re: Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron, nhamdan59
      • Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron, dda1
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, nhamdan2
      • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, dda1
  • Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law, Bilge
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Dlo
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, Rudolf Drabek
  • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, dda1
    • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, Rudolf Drabek
      • Rudolf Drabek - latent kook, dda1
      • Re: Rudolf Drabek - latent kook, Rudolf Drabek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group, Rudolf Drabek
• Why Why Why (admin plz post), Mr_Wizzird
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, xray4abc
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Bilge
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Bilge
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Bilge
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Bilge
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
  • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
    • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, stephen
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Nicolaas Vroom
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, stephen
      • Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity, Sue...
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, Igor
    • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, PD
    • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, PD
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, PD
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, PD
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, Sorcerer
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, PD
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, Sorcerer
      • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, Sue...
  • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, Igor
    • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
    • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, shuba
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, PD
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, shuba
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, Bilge
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, Bilge
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, Bilge
      • Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx<