sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: xxein
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: stephen
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: dlzc
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: socratus
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: stephen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: stephen
• Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Henry Haapalainen - the Fucking Imbecile Strikes Again
  • From: dda1
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Space-time and time dilation
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Marcel Luttgens - Shit Eater
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: David
• Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: jem
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: guido
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: castertroy14
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: castertroy14
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Clock Properties
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Sabbir Rahman - Endgame Exposed !!!
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Clock Properties
  • From: David
• Sabbir Rahman - Endgame Exposed !!!
  • From: dda1
• Re: Sabbir Rahman - Shit Head
  • From: dda1
• Re: Sabbir Rahman - Inept Arrogant, passes himself as physicist
  • From: dda1
• Re: Sabbir Rahman - Shit Head
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Sabbir Rahman - Inept Arrogant, passes himself as physicist
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Sabbir Rahman - Inept Arrogant, passes himself as physicist
  • From: dda1
• Sabbir Rahman - Shit Head
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: castertroy14
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Marcel Luttgens - Shit Eater
  • From: dda1
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Marcel Luttgens - Shit Eater
  • From: dda1
• (OT) Moderator Vacancy Announcement: sci.physics.plasma
  • From: Martin X. Moleski, SJ
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• derivation of kinetic energy
  • From: castertroy14
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Ajudem a defender a democracia!
  • From: Gamer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??
  • From: jcon
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Harry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Sue...
• Re: tha still wrongness of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: tha still wrongness of relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: tha still wrongness of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: Harry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: marcofuics
• Marcel Luttgens - Persistent Shit Eater
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Achille and the turtle.....
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Einstein interpretation of gravitational redshift is misleading
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• I found it!
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dda1
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Mass
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: xxein
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Mass
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Mass
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Mass
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Mass
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: puzzle in relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: puzzle in relativity
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Open season on crackpots - go get Vertner Vergon, the biggest CRETIN
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Mass
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An enlightening exercise motivated by Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Phineas T Puddluduck
  • From: dda1
• Re: Mass
  • From: dda1
• Re: Mass
  • From: dda1
• Re: Mass
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: shuba
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Updated theory
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: An enlightening exercise motivated by Androcles
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Updated theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• An enlightening exercise motivated by Androcles
  • From: Spoonfed
• Higginbottom - Bottom Head
  • From: dda1
• Updated theory
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Is there Pions in the nucleus??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Tde
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Answer this question Porat
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Sorcerer
• The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Zanket - a Motherfucking IDIOT
  • From: Zanket
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Zanket - a Motherfucking IDIOT
  • From: dda1
• Re: Space-Time Is Not Curved?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: xxein
• Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
  • From: goodbyeblueskye
• Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Communications
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Mass
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Mass
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: shuba
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Lij
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: Space-Time Is Not Curved?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Space-Time Is Not Curved?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Mass
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Communications
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: shuba
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Communications
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Communications
  • From: Joe
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Moc
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: David
• Re: Communications
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: Communications
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Mass
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Communications
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Communications
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Communications
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mass
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Mass
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A Flaw of General Relativity, a New Metric and Cosmological Implications
  • From: Zanket
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Let's try a similar experiment (Was: ANYONE CAN BECOME A RELATIVITY HYPNOTIST)
  • From: Jim Black
• Let's try a similar experiment (Was: ANYONE CAN BECOME A RELATIVITY HYPNOTIST)
  • From: Jim Black
• Communications
  • From: Joe
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Henri Wilson - Perenial Cretin
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Abbe George Lemaitre
  • From: Jim O'Reilly
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Answer this question Porat
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Koobee - Persistent Shit Eater
  • From: dda1
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations 5"
  • From: Lij
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: bernardz
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: xxein
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: shuba
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Relativity
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: PD
• Re: human hands emit invisible energy
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• "Corrections to Special Relativity 5"
  • From: Lij
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Koobee Wublee - SHIT EATER
  • From: dda1
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: titus_piezas
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Abbe George Lemaitre
  • From: shuba
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: PD
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: PD
• Re: "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts
  • From: dlzc
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 'fast' rotating planet effects?
  • From: martin . winer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where is the flaw?
  • From: PD
• Where is the flaw?
  • From: cafeinst
• Abbe George Lemaitre
  • From: Jim O'Reilly
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Igor
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Challenging exercises in relativity theory
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: stephen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? 5"
  • From: Lij
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: PD
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: PD
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: shuba
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: kenseto
• A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Experiment
  • From: titus_piezas
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• "proof" is completely irrelevant. - Tom Roberts
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: enigma . valdez
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: enigma . valdez
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: It's all Soooo Amusing!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: How Long since PD had a job?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Phineas T Puddluduck
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Phineas T Puddluduck
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: JanPB
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: vanep
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Phineas T Puddluduck
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: Todd
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dwain W. Higginbotham - IDIOT
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Dwain W. Higginbotham - IDIOT
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: shuba
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Alex
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Is Earth's orbit about the Sun a constant location in space each year?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: PD
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: David
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Sue...
• Gravity Probe B
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: dda1
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Douglas Rudd
• Ken Seto and Henri Wilson KookFight having their coks sucked by Nizar Hamdan
  • From: dda1
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: PD
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Douglas Rudd
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Nizar Hamdan : crackpot
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• SMAL DICK ken seto, INTELECTUAL MIDGET
  • From: dda1
• Re: Open season on crackpots
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Open season on crackpots
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: stephen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: PD
• Relativity
  • From: Douglas Rudd
• Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: PD
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: Ken Seto and Henri Wilson KookFight
  • From: nhamdan59
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers
  • From: nhamdan59
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers
  • From: nhamdan59
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron
  • From: nhamdan59
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter 5"
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter 5"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter 5"
  • From: Lij
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: stephen
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: Unfication of Physics
  • From: Mr . Whiffle
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Mr . Whiffle
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rudolf Drabek - latent kook
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: Prometheus
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: fellowgoodnice
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: Sue...
• THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!
  • From: fellowgoodnice
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: Sue...
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - fraud
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter/fraud
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - fraud
  • From: dda1
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: Todd
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
  • From: dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - shameless self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is Ann Coulter the media?
  • From: johnreynolds2222
• Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: xxein
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is Ann Coulter the media?
  • From: xxein
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: xxein
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: David
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: robert
• Re: amplitude of a photon
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• amplitude of a photon
  • From: robert
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: xxein
• Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality.
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: Todd
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple length problem - for Todd, Harald, thinkers
  • From: David
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality.
  • From: YBM
• Actual Reality Versus Observed Reality.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron
  • From: dda1
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: dda1
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: dda1
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: nhamdan2
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: nhamdan2
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Voyager spacecraft anomaly
  • From: Prometheus
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: dda1
• Rudolf Drabek - latent kook
  • From: dda1
• Ken Seto and Henri Wilson KookFight
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - pure conceited moron
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - simply moron
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter of shit papers
  • From: dda1
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: dda1
• Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sagnac
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Sue...
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Sue...
• [I just happened to see this]
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - Shit Writer , Psedo-Scientist
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Physical Laws and Relativity principle
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - shameless self promoter
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: nhamdan2 via NatScience.com
• Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: Bilge
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: PHOTON HAS NO MASS -
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON HAS NO MASS -
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: Anti-relativists in an IOP article - recognise names
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Sagnac
  • From: xxein
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON HAS NO MASS -
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: johnreed take 1A - modified June 6, 2006
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: Igor
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Vert
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Sagnac
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Sagnac
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac
  • From: dda1
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Sagnac
  • From: Douglas Rudd
• Re: Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: dda1
• Re: Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- NOT A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Nizar Hamdan - insistent self promoter of his shit "papers"
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Newton’s Second Law is a Relativistic Law
  • From: nhamdan2
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: c = constant is still under discussion in this group
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Why Why Why (admin plz post)
  • From: Mr_Wizzird
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do electrons ATTRACT each other in OPPOSITE direction in 2 wires???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why don't protons attract due to gluons and only with neutrons?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Present.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: shuba
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: PD
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: beginner thought experiments
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: PD
• Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck