Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:43:23 GMT
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:uk9ba2p4ct9kj5tg206mtq1a2rfbg81ltv@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:09:22 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:p2l8a2dttt3vlpq3alftr1ea2n1dupdurt@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| >| >| Look A, I wish you would throw away this argument. It is becoming a
| >| >liability.
| >| >
| >| >*** you! Velocities do not have a round trip, so wish away all you
want
| >to.
| >| >Cassini has a clock, not a mirror.
| >|
| >| A, let me explain.
| >|
| >| TWLS experiments require a light source, a mirror and a clock.
| >
| >Cassini has no mirror. It absorbs and re-emits. You are fucked right
there.
|
| Your Cassini is not a TWLS experiment. It is an OWLS comparison.
*** off, you couldn't see your reflection in Cassini's mirror if it had
one.
You can't even see Cassini. Knowing you, I doubt you could even find Saturn.
It's the planet with a ring around it, easily seen with a 30x telescope.
Being
in the ecliptic it is visible from Oz, although d-Ceph isn't.
Telescopes are not expensive:
http://www.telescopeplanet.co.uk/
A lot cheaper than the 3 cases of Glenlivet you owe me.
|
| >|
| >| A light pulse from the source is sent towards the mirror which reflects
it
| >back
| >| to the clock.
| >
| >Cassini has no mirror. It absorbs and re-emits. You are fucked right
there.
|
| Your Cassini is not a TWLS experiment. It is an OWLS comparison.
You can make it one easily enough, ask Cassini the time. I'll guarantee
it won't agree with Einstein's prediction.
|
|
| >| You seem to be claiming that it takes zero time to do this because the
| >clock
| >| hasn't moved.
| >
| >I'm not talking about physics, I'm talking about EQUATIONS.
|
| Your equations are usually wrong.
Arsehole! You never learned x-x = 0, not 2x.
|
| >| Now, I want you to perform a simple experiment.
| >|
| >| Stand one metre away from a mirror and look at yourself.
| >|
| >| Q. Is your image 1 metre beyond the mirror or is it right where you are
| >| standing?
| >
| >
| >My distance from the mirror is -x, the mirror's distance from me is
| >+x. x+(-x) = 0x, not 2x.
|
| That's where you are wrong.
| Your virtual image is 2x away from you.
I told you, I'm talking about equations, not physics.
My distance from the mirror is -x, the mirror's distance from me is
+x. x+(-x) = 0x, not 2x. I said nothing about any virtual image.
You should read "Alice Through the Looking Glass.", Queen Henri.
"I can't believe that!" said Alice.
"Can't you?" the queen said in a pitying tone. "Try again, draw a long
breath, and shut your eyes."
Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said. "One can't believe
impossible things."
"I dare say you haven't had much practice," said the queen. "When I was your
age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as
many as six impossible things before breakfast."
| >When I move the image shows where I was,
| >not where I am now. That's very simple, if I stand 1 light-second
| >from the mirror I'll see myself wink at myself 2 seconds later than I
| >winked. I'll need a fucking good telescope though, so instead I'll
| >use my webcam and send the image around the internet, up to a satellite
| >and back to my computer and see myself wink later than I winked.
| >I'm not into pornography, so I won't wank.
|
| ...except verbally...
So says Queen Henri the shithead who writes equations as seen in
horizontal looking glasses. Learn what "minus" means, you may
become as smart as my grandson.
Androcles.
|
| >te that radio engineers never studied basic optics and don't
| >| >| understand the difference between a real and a virtual image...but
| >that's
| >| >no
| >| >| excuse.
| >| >|
| >| >| According to the BaTh, tAB = tBA and OWLS = TWLS = tA'-tA/2AB = c
| >| >
| >| >Hey bonehead! You mean tA'-tA/2AB = 1/c
| >| >You are senile, mistaking hpm for mph.
| >| >TWLS = 0AB/(t'A-tA) = 0/0.
| >| >BaTh is ***, drunken wabo.
| >| >BTW, I used to find mirror centre with a real image of a theodolite
| >upside
| >| >down superimposed on a real theodolite, you moron.
| >|
| >| Now you see equations upside down, stupid pommie ***....
| >
| >It's you that wrote it upside down, imbecile abo. As we all know,
Australia
| >is upside down.
| >Androcles.
| >
|
|
| HW.
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
|
| Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
|
.
- Prev by Date: Re: The proof of mass vector.
- Next by Date: Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
- Previous by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Index(es):