Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:sv6ca2tt3ippcoikmte010a7a6jeqv4tie@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:43:23 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:uk9ba2p4ct9kj5tg206mtq1a2rfbg81ltv@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| >| >
| >| >Cassini has no mirror. It absorbs and re-emits. You are fucked right
| >there.
| >|
| >| Your Cassini is not a TWLS experiment. It is an OWLS comparison.
| >
| >*** off, you couldn't see your reflection in Cassini's mirror if it had
| >one.
| >You can't even see Cassini. Knowing you, I doubt you could even find
Saturn.
| >It's the planet with a ring around it, easily seen with a 30x telescope.
| >Being
| >in the ecliptic it is visible from Oz, although d-Ceph isn't.
|
| I looked at it many years ago.

Not from Oz... You can't see d-Ceph through the Earth, it is eclipsed.

|
| >Telescopes are not expensive:
| > http://www.telescopeplanet.co.uk/
| >A lot cheaper than the 3 cases of Glenlivet you owe me.
|
| BULL!!!

Maybe you are destitute... I can afford a telescope, but then,
I already have one.



|
|
| >| >Cassini has no mirror. It absorbs and re-emits. You are fucked right
| >there.
| >|
| >| Your Cassini is not a TWLS experiment. It is an OWLS comparison.
| >
| >You can make it one easily enough, ask Cassini the time. I'll guarantee
| >it won't agree with Einstein's prediction.
|
| I'll agree with that...but it will be difficult to actually fix its orbit
| around Saturn accurately enough to know.


If you had a telescope you'd see a virtual image of what you
were doing 2.4 hours earlier, reflected in Cassini's mirror if it had one,
and the virtual ruler against your virtual nose would read zero.


|
| >| >| You seem to be claiming that it takes zero time to do this because
the
| >| >clock
| >| >| hasn't moved.
| >| >
| >| >I'm not talking about physics, I'm talking about EQUATIONS.
| >|
| >| Your equations are usually wrong.
| >
| >Arsehole! You never learned x-x = 0, not 2x.
|
| I never said it wasn't..

Yes you did, you said (t'A-tA)/2AB = c where x = AB. I can forgive
you for getting the equation upside down since you are a wabo and
Waboland is upside down. You are still an arsehole, c = 0/0


|
|
| >| >| Q. Is your image 1 metre beyond the mirror or is it right where you
are
| >| >| standing?
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >My distance from the mirror is -x, the mirror's distance from me is
| >| >+x. x+(-x) = 0x, not 2x.
| >|
| >| That's where you are wrong.
| >| Your virtual image is 2x away from you.
| >
| >I told you, I'm talking about equations, not physics.
| > My distance from the mirror is -x, the mirror's distance from me is
| >+x. x+(-x) = 0x, not 2x. I said nothing about any virtual image.
|
| ...Because you never studied optic.

You never studied math. You failed 2nd grade and don't know what
negative numbers are or how to add them.

|
| Your virtual image is distance x from the mirror. That is 2x from you.

Then a foot ruler against your nose should have a virtual number 24 against
your virtual nose. Empirical evidence says you are wrong.


| >You should read "Alice Through the Looking Glass.", Queen Henri.
|
| I'll leave that to the SRians.

They believe 2AB/(t'A-tA) = c and so do you, Queen Henri. You believe
the impossible just like them.



|
| >
| >"I can't believe that!" said Alice.
| >
| >"Can't you?" the queen said in a pitying tone. "Try again, draw a long
| >breath, and shut your eyes."
| >
| >Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said. "One can't believe
| >impossible things."
| >
| >"I dare say you haven't had much practice," said the queen. "When I was
your
| >age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed
as
| >many as six impossible things before breakfast."
| >
| >
| >
| >| >When I move the image shows where I was,
| >| >not where I am now. That's very simple, if I stand 1 light-second
| >| >from the mirror I'll see myself wink at myself 2 seconds later than I
| >| >winked. I'll need a fucking good telescope though, so instead I'll
| >| >use my webcam and send the image around the internet, up to a
satellite
| >| >and back to my computer and see myself wink later than I winked.
| >| >I'm not into pornography, so I won't wank.
| >|
| >| ...except verbally...
| >
| >So says Queen Henri the shithead who writes equations as seen in
| >horizontal looking glasses. Learn what "minus" means, you may
| >become as smart as my grandson.
|
| It's a pity you studied radio engineering instead of physics.


It's a pity you don't know what negative numbers are, especially
since you are upside down. Go on, Queen Henri, put a 1 ft ruler
between your nose and a mirror and see if it says 24 inches, arsehole.

Androcles



| >
| >
| >
| >|
| >| >te that radio engineers never studied basic optics and don't
| >| >| >| understand the difference between a real and a virtual
image...but
| >| >that's
| >| >| >no
| >| >| >| excuse.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| According to the BaTh, tAB = tBA and OWLS = TWLS = tA'-tA/2AB = c
| >| >| >
| >| >| >Hey bonehead! You mean tA'-tA/2AB = 1/c
| >| >| >You are senile, mistaking hpm for mph.
| >| >| >TWLS = 0AB/(t'A-tA) = 0/0.
| >| >| >BaTh is ***, drunken wabo.
| >| >| >BTW, I used to find mirror centre with a real image of a theodolite
| >| >upside
| >| >| >down superimposed on a real theodolite, you moron.
| >| >|
| >| >| Now you see equations upside down, stupid pommie ***....
| >| >
| >| >It's you that wrote it upside down, imbecile abo. As we all know,
| >Australia
| >| >is upside down.
| >| >Androcles.
| >| >
| >|
| >|
| >| HW.
| >| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
| >|
| >| Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
| >|
| >
|
|
| HW.
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
|
| Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
|


.

Quantcast