Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.

In article <1151796222.867072.253750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Vert <avergon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

VERGON
First of all I would like to thank you for an intelligent and
informative post -- Not like that idiot Puddlejumper. If I understand
you correctly, k is a wavenumber -- which I have called frequency
number or oscillation number, the latter being unambiguous.

You don't understand k - and call me stupid - priceless!!



As to h/lambda, that's just another way of writing hf/c.
In all cases, when you have h in an expression, you have mass. Observe:
h = E*t. ---- hf = E*t * n/t. ---- The t's cancel and we
have hf = nE .
Next , we have nE/c^2 = m. Recall Einstein wrote (for
radiation) m = E/c^2.

NO HE DID NOT....


I pwn y00

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my *** poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Quantcast