Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.

In article <1151796222.867072.253750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Vert <avergon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

irst of all I would like to thank you for an intelligent and
informative post -- Not like that idiot Puddlejumper. If I understand
you correctly, k is a wavenumber -- which I have called frequency
number or oscillation number, the latter being unambiguous.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavenumber

Allow me to educate you, if it is at all possible.

Wavenumber in most physical sciences is a wave property inversely
related to wavelength, having units of inverse length (radians per
meter). Wavenumber is the spatial analogue of angular frequency.
Application of a Fourier transformation on data in the time domain
yields a frequency spectrum; applied on data in the spatial domain
(data as a function of position) yields a spectrum as a function of
wavenumber. The exact definition is dependent on the field.

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my *** poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Quantcast